Soft-Tissue Volume Augmentation at Dental Implant Placement Using Collagen-Based Matrix Characterized by Oriented Open Pore Structure: A Retrospective Study with a Median Follow-Up of 17 Months

<b>Background/Objective:</b> Soft-tissue volume augmentation with gingival grafts enhances implant-prosthodontic esthetics by maintaining or reconstructing a convex contour of the vestibular mucosa. However, it presents disadvantages related to donor site, surgical complexity, and post-procedural discomfort. This study evaluated clinical performance of a native porcine-derived collagen-elastin matrix with uniquely oriented porous structure for soft-tissue volume augmentation at single implant sites. <b>Method and Materials:</b> Soft-tissue augmentation was performed at sites of a single implant, which underwent immediate, early, or late loading protocols. Implant success, its survival, and mucosal health status including change in tissue thickness acquired through 3D scans of casts prepared from impressions before and after tissue augmentation were evaluated. Biocompatibility of the collagen matrix (CM) was assessed through histological analyses. <b>Results:</b> Forty-five patients received 50 implants with simultaneous augmentation using CM. At the last follow-up (mean 22.1 ± 15.0 months), the peri-implant soft tissue was healthy and stable, and all implants were surviving and successful. Tissue thickness change at augmented sites did not vary with time interval between pre- and post-treatment, indicating stability of augmentation. Soft-tissue biopsies (n = 3) showed healthy peri-implant soft tissue with good vascularization and no inflammation. <b>Conclusions</b>: This retrospective analysis demonstrated good clinical performance and high biocompatibility of CM for soft-tissue volume augmentation around dental implants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioengineering
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12121324
Primary Topic
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Soft-Tissue Volume Augmentation at Dental Implant Placement Using Collagen-Based Matrix Characterized by Oriented Open Pore Structure: A Retrospective Study with a Median Follow-Up of 17 Months

Bastian Wessing, Bouke K. H. L. Boekema
Bioengineering
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
article

Soft-Tissue Volume Augmentation at Dental Implant Placement Using Collagen-Based Matrix Characterized by Oriented Open Pore Structure: A Retrospective Study with a Median Follow-Up of 17 Months

Bastian Wessing, Bouke K. H. L. Boekema
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objective:</b> Soft-tissue volume augmentation with gingival grafts enhances implant-prosthodontic esthetics by maintaining or reconstructing a convex contour of the vestibular mucosa. However, it presents disadvantages related to donor site, surgical complexity, and post-procedural discomfort. This study evaluated clinical performance of a native porcine-derived collagen-elastin matrix with uniquely oriented porous structure for soft-tissue volume augmentation at single implant sites. <b>Method and Materials:</b> Soft-tissue augmentation was performed at sites of a single implant, which underwent immediate, early, or late loading protocols. Implant success, its survival, and mucosal health status including change in tissue thickness acquired through 3D scans of casts prepared from impressions before and after tissue augmentation were evaluated. Biocompatibility of the collagen matrix (CM) was assessed through histological analyses. <b>Results:</b> Forty-five patients received 50 implants with simultaneous augmentation using CM. At the last follow-up (mean 22.1 ± 15.0 months), the peri-implant soft tissue was healthy and stable, and all implants were surviving and successful. Tissue thickness change at augmented sites did not vary with time interval between pre- and post-treatment, indicating stability of augmentation. Soft-tissue biopsies (n = 3) showed healthy peri-implant soft tissue with good vascularization and no inflammation. <b>Conclusions</b>: This retrospective analysis demonstrated good clinical performance and high biocompatibility of CM for soft-tissue volume augmentation around dental implants.

BioengineeringVol. 12(12)
MSB Medical School Berlin (DE), Luisenhospital Aachen (DE), Association of Dutch Burn Centres (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.