A Review of Methods for Research Synthesis

Meta-analysis consists of a wide range of methods for summarizing existing research, often by aggregating summary statistics. The dominant methods are the fixed effect and the random effects models, which assume that all studies included in a meta-analysis are similar. In many scenarios, the available studies differ in important ways, for example, in terms of research design and sample population. To handle this heterogeneity, more advanced methods are required. In this article, we review some of these methods that have been proposed in the past decades: hierarchical models, bias adjustment and quality weighting methods, Bayesian methods, and decision-centered meta-analysis. We aim to describe the theoretical rationale behind the methods and to give examples of applications. Each method has advantages and limitations, and we consider ways of combining methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Statistics in Medicine
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.70314
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Review of Methods for Research Synthesis

Matteo Bottai, Pär Villner
Statistics in Medicine
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
article

A Review of Methods for Research Synthesis

Matteo Bottai, Pär Villner
article en

Abstract

Meta-analysis consists of a wide range of methods for summarizing existing research, often by aggregating summary statistics. The dominant methods are the fixed effect and the random effects models, which assume that all studies included in a meta-analysis are similar. In many scenarios, the available studies differ in important ways, for example, in terms of research design and sample population. To handle this heterogeneity, more advanced methods are required. In this article, we review some of these methods that have been proposed in the past decades: hierarchical models, bias adjustment and quality weighting methods, Bayesian methods, and decision-centered meta-analysis. We aim to describe the theoretical rationale behind the methods and to give examples of applications. Each method has advantages and limitations, and we consider ways of combining methods.

Statistics in MedicineVol. 44(28-30)
Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.