Evaluation of Self-Collected Mouth Rinse Specimens for Coronavirus Disease 2019 Testing: A Pilot Study
Saliva specimens are widely used for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) testing using RT-qPCR due to their advantages over nasopharyngeal swabs of being non-invasive and self-collectable. However, saliva collection can be time-consuming in individuals with reduced saliva secretion, including those with diabetes, diseases involving salivary glands such as Sjögren’s syndrome, and older adults. In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic performance of mouth rinse specimens, which can be easily collected even from individuals with reduced saliva secretion, as an alternative to saliva for RT-qPCR COVID-19 testing. Among the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) positive specimens analyzed, 88.2% were derived from patients possessing risk factors associated with reduced salivary secretion, including diabetes, use of medications such as anticholinergics or antihistamines, smoking, and older age. The analysis results of mouth rinse specimens demonstrated 96.7% overall agreement with those of saliva specimens, with a sensitivity of 94.1% and specificity of 100%; however, the viral load in the mouth rinse specimens was lower than that in saliva because of sample dilution. These findings suggest that mouth rinse specimens are a practical, versatile, and reliable alternative specimen for RT-qPCR COVID-19 testing.
Authors
- Junko S. Takeuchi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4844-9013)
- Wataru Sugiura (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3132-0918)
- Azusa Kamikawa
- Moto Kimura (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2202-5527)
- Kento Fukano (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0030-6072)
- Junko Terada-Hirashima (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1437-5896)
Institutions
- Institute for Security Studies (KE)
- Institute for Health Economics and Policy (JP)
Publication Details
- Journal
- COVID
- Published
- 2025-12-04
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/covid5120202
- Primary Topic
- SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00