Is the serological bee/vespula venom-specific IgE ratio supplemented by component-resolved diagnostics a reliable alternative to skin testing for hymenoptera venom allergy?
Abstract Background A reliable diagnosis of hymenoptera venom allergy is based on medical history, skin tests, and serological immunoglobulin E (IgE) determination. Over the past 10 years, component-resolved diagnostics (CRD) have gained in importance, and new strategies for interpreting serological double sensitization have been introduced with the bee/vespula venom-specific IgE ratio. Objectives The aim was to examine whether the bee/vespula venom-specific IgE ratio supplemented by CRD can be a reliable alternative to skin testing. Methods In a student project, the guideline algorithm for serological diagnostics was supplemented with the sIgE ratio (≥ 5:1) and tested in a simulation using anonymized data from a retrospective study (Fischer et al.). A partial data set of 375 cases with complete CRD and documented prick and intradermal test results was selected for the simulation. The performance of the algorithm was evaluated by a post hoc comparison of the algorithmic therapy recommendations with the allergen immunotherapies (AIT) actually implemented in the clinic. Results The simulation yielded 48.5% monosensitizations and 49.9% double sensitizations. In 56.3% of the double sensitizations, the ratio ≥ 5:1 indicated a dominant sensitization, which was classified as a mono-allergy. The therapies suggested by the algorithm corresponded to the clinically implemented AIT in 91% of cases; overall, the correspondence was 89.7%. While the algorithm predicted double AIT in 10% of cases, this was only clinically implemented in 2.7% of cases, with anamnestic details on sting circumstances and diagnostic certainty influencing the decision. Conclusion Standardized serological diagnostics with bee/vespula venom-specific IgE ratio and CRD provide high diagnostic precision and comprehensively demonstrate the progress made over the last 10 years. Skin tests remain a medically useful and valuable part of diagnostics, especially in cases of double sensitization.
Authors
- Jörg Fischer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6305-6659)
- Sebastian Volc (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3543-4848)
- Lena Löffelad
- Ralf Wenninger
Institutions
- University of Augsburg (DE)
- University Hospital Augsburg (DE)
- University Children's Hospital Tübingen (DE)
- University of Tübingen (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Allergo Journal International
- Published
- 2025-12-04
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s40629-025-00359-3
- Primary Topic
- Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00