What Parents, Teachers and Clinicians Know About the Features of Developmental Dyslexia and Its Intervention: A Scoping Review

Despite decades of research, misconceptions about developmental dyslexia remain widespread among those responsible for identifying and supporting affected children. Identifying the nature and persistence of these beliefs is essential to improving practice and policy. We conducted a scoping review to map the understanding of developmental dyslexia among teachers, parents and clinicians by identifying their beliefs about its features and interventions. The review included 95 studies on dyslexia features and 56 studies on dyslexia intervention. Thematic analyses identified several accurate beliefs (n = 17) across stakeholder groups (e.g., dyslexia is a neurological condition, early intervention is important) as well as false beliefs (n = 4) and partially correct beliefs (n = 18; e.g., dyslexia is a visual problem, dyslexia can be outgrown). Statistical analyses showed no significant differences in the prevalence of false beliefs between teachers, parents and clinicians. The findings suggest that misconceptions are rooted in the progressive scientific landscape of dyslexia research, highlighting the need for targeted professional development, improved dissemination of evidence-based practices and further research to address gaps in understanding and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dyslexia
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.70017
Primary Topic
Reading and Literacy Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Parents, Teachers and Clinicians Know About the Features of Developmental Dyslexia and Its Intervention: A Scoping Review

Gill Coverdale, Genevieve M. McArthur, Nicholas A. Badcock, Donna M. Bayliss et al.
Dyslexia
Reading and Literacy Development
article

What Parents, Teachers and Clinicians Know About the Features of Developmental Dyslexia and Its Intervention: A Scoping Review

Gill Coverdale, Genevieve M. McArthur, Nicholas A. Badcock, Donna M. Bayliss, Breanna Bollig
article en

Abstract

Despite decades of research, misconceptions about developmental dyslexia remain widespread among those responsible for identifying and supporting affected children. Identifying the nature and persistence of these beliefs is essential to improving practice and policy. We conducted a scoping review to map the understanding of developmental dyslexia among teachers, parents and clinicians by identifying their beliefs about its features and interventions. The review included 95 studies on dyslexia features and 56 studies on dyslexia intervention. Thematic analyses identified several accurate beliefs (n = 17) across stakeholder groups (e.g., dyslexia is a neurological condition, early intervention is important) as well as false beliefs (n = 4) and partially correct beliefs (n = 18; e.g., dyslexia is a visual problem, dyslexia can be outgrown). Statistical analyses showed no significant differences in the prevalence of false beliefs between teachers, parents and clinicians. The findings suggest that misconceptions are rooted in the progressive scientific landscape of dyslexia research, highlighting the need for targeted professional development, improved dissemination of evidence-based practices and further research to address gaps in understanding and practice.

DyslexiaVol. 32(1)
The Kids Research Institute Australia (AU), The University of Western Australia (AU), Dyslexia Foundation (US), Australian Catholic University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Reading and Literacy Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.