Travel Distance and Its Impact on Wait Time for Positron Emission Tomography–Computed Tomography in Patients with Cancers

To examine travel distance and its impact on wait time for positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with lung and prostate cancers and lymphoma in Alberta. We used the Alberta cancer registry and diagnostic imaging database to identify patients with lung and prostate cancers and lymphoma who had a PET/CT scan during April 2017 and March 2023. The Alberta Facilities Distance/Time Look Up Table was used to calculate travel distance from the patient's residence to the PET/CT facility. Negative binomial regression was used to assess the association between travel distance and wait time for PET/CT. The study included 9503 patients. Lung cancer accounted for 43.4% of the patients, followed by lymphoma (37.1%) and prostate (19.5%) cancer. There were more female patients with lung cancer (55.5%) than lymphoma (42.9%; <i>p</i> < 0.001). The mean (SD) age was 66.8 (13.8) years and lymphoma patients were younger (59.6 years) than lung (70.3 years; <i>p</i> < 0.001) or prostate (72.7 years; <i>p</i> < 0.001) cancer patients. Diabetes (14.2%) was the most prevalent comorbidity. The median (IQR) travel distance was 21 (12-121) km and this was shorter for urban (16 km) than rural (148 km; <i>p</i> < 0.001) patients, but the wait time was similar (median = 20 vs. 21 days; <i>p</i> = 0.378). There were no significant associations between travel distance and wait time (IRR = 1.00; <i>p</i> = 0.108). The results were robust in subgroup analyses by type of cancer and scan priority. There were no associations between travel distance and wait time for PET/CT. Additional research is warranted to examine the potential impact of longer travel distances on overall access to care and patient outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22121816
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Travel Distance and Its Impact on Wait Time for Positron Emission Tomography–Computed Tomography in Patients with Cancers

Morio Ueyama, Dat T. Tran, Rizwan Shahid, Xiaoxiao Liu et al.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
article

Travel Distance and Its Impact on Wait Time for Positron Emission Tomography–Computed Tomography in Patients with Cancers

Morio Ueyama, Dat T. Tran, Rizwan Shahid, Xiaoxiao Liu, Alka Patel
article en

Abstract

To examine travel distance and its impact on wait time for positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with lung and prostate cancers and lymphoma in Alberta. We used the Alberta cancer registry and diagnostic imaging database to identify patients with lung and prostate cancers and lymphoma who had a PET/CT scan during April 2017 and March 2023. The Alberta Facilities Distance/Time Look Up Table was used to calculate travel distance from the patient's residence to the PET/CT facility. Negative binomial regression was used to assess the association between travel distance and wait time for PET/CT. The study included 9503 patients. Lung cancer accounted for 43.4% of the patients, followed by lymphoma (37.1%) and prostate (19.5%) cancer. There were more female patients with lung cancer (55.5%) than lymphoma (42.9%; <i>p</i> < 0.001). The mean (SD) age was 66.8 (13.8) years and lymphoma patients were younger (59.6 years) than lung (70.3 years; <i>p</i> < 0.001) or prostate (72.7 years; <i>p</i> < 0.001) cancer patients. Diabetes (14.2%) was the most prevalent comorbidity. The median (IQR) travel distance was 21 (12-121) km and this was shorter for urban (16 km) than rural (148 km; <i>p</i> < 0.001) patients, but the wait time was similar (median = 20 vs. 21 days; <i>p</i> = 0.378). There were no significant associations between travel distance and wait time (IRR = 1.00; <i>p</i> = 0.108). The results were robust in subgroup analyses by type of cancer and scan priority. There were no associations between travel distance and wait time for PET/CT. Additional research is warranted to examine the potential impact of longer travel distances on overall access to care and patient outcomes.

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthVol. 22(12)
Alberta Health Services (CA), University of Alberta (CA), University of Calgary (CA), Institute of Health Economics (CA)
Government of Alberta
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.