Science in a World on Fire: The Impact of Donald Trump's Anti‐Climate Policies on Social Psychological Research

ABSTRACT On January 20th, 2025, United States President Donald Trump signed an executive order seeking to dismantle and halt all federal funding producing research and programmatic applications along any intersection of “diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility” (DEIA), as well as programs and research on “environmental justice.” Policies such as the January 20th executive order, as well as the directives to halt all grant funding and research at large governmental agencies such as the National Institute for Health (NIH), the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and the Center for Disease Control (CDC), have direct implication for social psychology research on climate change, namely for those who use data from these governmental‐ and NGO‐ level agencies. These directives, even if not fully realized, carry unprecedented potential to directly undermine the ability of social scientists to engage in the critical scholarship necessary to understand the complexity and severity of negative social outcomes induced by anthropogenic climate change. For example, much of our research on the casual relationship between climate change and human violence comes from research produced by governmental‐level data on crime, war conflict, resource accessibility, immigration, and weather disasters. Without the systematic intention and efforts across disciplines and federal‐level agencies to produce, report, and share this data, we would not be able to raise awareness of the existential social and psychological threat posed by the climate crisis. This article outlines the severity of the impact of such policies on understanding the holistic nature of the social and ecological threat of climate change, and the ability for scientists to help aid policymakers in being proactive and prepared to address these issues. Additionally, we discuss the historical role of suppressing social psychological research to create sociological consent for the oppression and neglect of materially and socially marginalized people, such as racial outgroups, immigrants, and refugees.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social and Personality Psychology Compass
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.70111
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Science in a World on Fire: The Impact of Donald Trump's Anti‐Climate Policies on Social Psychological Research

Andreas Miles‐Novelo, Craig A. Anderson
Social and Personality Psychology Compass
Climate Change Communication and Perception
article

Science in a World on Fire: The Impact of Donald Trump's Anti‐Climate Policies on Social Psychological Research

Andreas Miles‐Novelo, Craig A. Anderson
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT On January 20th, 2025, United States President Donald Trump signed an executive order seeking to dismantle and halt all federal funding producing research and programmatic applications along any intersection of “diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility” (DEIA), as well as programs and research on “environmental justice.” Policies such as the January 20th executive order, as well as the directives to halt all grant funding and research at large governmental agencies such as the National Institute for Health (NIH), the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and the Center for Disease Control (CDC), have direct implication for social psychology research on climate change, namely for those who use data from these governmental‐ and NGO‐ level agencies. These directives, even if not fully realized, carry unprecedented potential to directly undermine the ability of social scientists to engage in the critical scholarship necessary to understand the complexity and severity of negative social outcomes induced by anthropogenic climate change. For example, much of our research on the casual relationship between climate change and human violence comes from research produced by governmental‐level data on crime, war conflict, resource accessibility, immigration, and weather disasters. Without the systematic intention and efforts across disciplines and federal‐level agencies to produce, report, and share this data, we would not be able to raise awareness of the existential social and psychological threat posed by the climate crisis. This article outlines the severity of the impact of such policies on understanding the holistic nature of the social and ecological threat of climate change, and the ability for scientists to help aid policymakers in being proactive and prepared to address these issues. Additionally, we discuss the historical role of suppressing social psychological research to create sociological consent for the oppression and neglect of materially and socially marginalized people, such as racial outgroups, immigrants, and refugees.

Social and Personality Psychology CompassVol. 19(12)
Iowa State University (US), Fielding Graduate University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.