Enhancing Bonding Properties of Steel‐Composite Joints: Effects of Surface Treatments and Adhesive Selection

ABSTRACT Steel‐composite joints being a crucial part of complex architectures requiring adhesion/bonding are an area of increasing interest. Such adhesion depends on several factors including the choice of adhesives and the employed surface treatments. However, there isn't any study systematically reporting the influence of the mentioned factors. This work analyzes the effects of surface treatments and adhesive types on the adhesion and performance of steel‐composite joints. Untreated, mechanically treated, acid‐etched, and anodized steel specimens were joined with composites employing three distinct adhesives, such as Aremco 2310, polyurethane (PU), and silicone. Microscopic analysis revealed that untreated samples had a smooth surface, whereas treated samples had rough abraded lines, pores, and oxide layers. Surface contact angles also indicated higher surface energies owing to oxidization. Lap shear revealed that anodized treatment offers about 45% higher strength than untreated specimens. Among different adhesives, Aremco 2310 had the maximum shear strength, followed by a decreasing trend towards PU and silicone. Aremco/anodized composite entailed 17% higher Izod Impact strength than untreated ones, and the highest among all specimens proving the combination suitable. Hence, the investigation highlights the necessity of surface treatments and the selection of suitable adhesives to tailor the performance of steel‐composite joints.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Polymer Composites
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.70697
Primary Topic
Mechanical Behavior of Composites
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing Bonding Properties of Steel‐Composite Joints: Effects of Surface Treatments and Adhesive Selection

Muhammad Umair, Muzzamal Hussain, Adeel Abbas, Khubab Shaker et al.
Polymer Composites
Mechanical Behavior of Composites
article

Enhancing Bonding Properties of Steel‐Composite Joints: Effects of Surface Treatments and Adhesive Selection

Muhammad Umair, Muzzamal Hussain, Adeel Abbas, Khubab Shaker, Tehseen Ullah, Yasir Nawab
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Steel‐composite joints being a crucial part of complex architectures requiring adhesion/bonding are an area of increasing interest. Such adhesion depends on several factors including the choice of adhesives and the employed surface treatments. However, there isn't any study systematically reporting the influence of the mentioned factors. This work analyzes the effects of surface treatments and adhesive types on the adhesion and performance of steel‐composite joints. Untreated, mechanically treated, acid‐etched, and anodized steel specimens were joined with composites employing three distinct adhesives, such as Aremco 2310, polyurethane (PU), and silicone. Microscopic analysis revealed that untreated samples had a smooth surface, whereas treated samples had rough abraded lines, pores, and oxide layers. Surface contact angles also indicated higher surface energies owing to oxidization. Lap shear revealed that anodized treatment offers about 45% higher strength than untreated specimens. Among different adhesives, Aremco 2310 had the maximum shear strength, followed by a decreasing trend towards PU and silicone. Aremco/anodized composite entailed 17% higher Izod Impact strength than untreated ones, and the highest among all specimens proving the combination suitable. Hence, the investigation highlights the necessity of surface treatments and the selection of suitable adhesives to tailor the performance of steel‐composite joints.

Polymer Composites
National Textile University (PK), RMIT University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Mechanical Behavior of Composites
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Enhancing Bonding Properties of Steel‐Composite Joints: Effects of Surface Treatments and Adhesive Selection — Muhammad Umair, Muzzamal Hussain, et al. · Polymer Composites (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS