Constitutional protections in utilising artificial intelligence systems for investigating and inferring crimes: a comparative study

This paper explores the potential use of artificial intelligence (AI) systems in investigating and deducing crimes and examines their impact on constitutional and legislative guarantees. With the rise of AI entities committing crimes using advanced systems. However, it can be used like any other technical system in the investigation and reasoning process. The problem arises in how to apply constitutional guarantees to the accused when AI systems investigate and deduce the crime. The paper reveals that there are no constitutional or legislative texts in Jordan related to the use of AI systems during the investigation and inference phase of crimes. Although many countries use AI systems for data and information collection, such as the USA, Britain, Germany, and the United Arab Emirates, they have not yet used them legally in the inference, investigation, and investigation processes through AI itself.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Electronic Security and Digital Forensics
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1504/ijesdf.2026.150188
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Constitutional protections in utilising artificial intelligence systems for investigating and inferring crimes: a comparative study

Nayel AlOmran, Ashraf Fathi Al
International Journal of Electronic Security and Digital Forensics
Artificial Intelligence in Law
article

Constitutional protections in utilising artificial intelligence systems for investigating and inferring crimes: a comparative study

Nayel AlOmran, Ashraf Fathi Al
article en

Abstract

This paper explores the potential use of artificial intelligence (AI) systems in investigating and deducing crimes and examines their impact on constitutional and legislative guarantees. With the rise of AI entities committing crimes using advanced systems. However, it can be used like any other technical system in the investigation and reasoning process. The problem arises in how to apply constitutional guarantees to the accused when AI systems investigate and deduce the crime. The paper reveals that there are no constitutional or legislative texts in Jordan related to the use of AI systems during the investigation and inference phase of crimes. Although many countries use AI systems for data and information collection, such as the USA, Britain, Germany, and the United Arab Emirates, they have not yet used them legally in the inference, investigation, and investigation processes through AI itself.

International Journal of Electronic Security and Digital ForensicsVol. 18(1)
Zayed University (AE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Artificial Intelligence in Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.