Automatic Judging for Precision Aerobatics

Assisting or replacing human judges in aerobatic competitions offers an opportunity to reduce the natural subjectivity associated with human scoring and makes it possible to run continuous competitions globally without the environmental overheads of international travel. Automatic judging is accomplished here by segmenting a flight trajectory into defined maneuvers and then assessing the elements of those maneuvers against a defined baseline. This allows the scoring technique to be unambiguously applied. Computed results indicate reasonable correlation between automatic and human-derived scores, and an expanding database has been built to further accumulate flight data and scores for future development. Additional possible applications of the process include pilot training and piloted system verification and validation against the requirements documentation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Aircraft
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c038473
Primary Topic
Aerospace and Aviation Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automatic Judging for Precision Aerobatics

Artur Uzieblo, Thomas Richardson, Jasmin Wong, Thomas Rendall et al.
Journal of Aircraft
Aerospace and Aviation Technology
article

Automatic Judging for Precision Aerobatics

Artur Uzieblo, Thomas Richardson, Jasmin Wong, Thomas Rendall, Paulo Iscold, AR Mansell, Thomas David
article en

Abstract

Assisting or replacing human judges in aerobatic competitions offers an opportunity to reduce the natural subjectivity associated with human scoring and makes it possible to run continuous competitions globally without the environmental overheads of international travel. Automatic judging is accomplished here by segmenting a flight trajectory into defined maneuvers and then assessing the elements of those maneuvers against a defined baseline. This allows the scoring technique to be unambiguously applied. Computed results indicate reasonable correlation between automatic and human-derived scores, and an expanding database has been built to further accumulate flight data and scores for future development. Additional possible applications of the process include pilot training and piloted system verification and validation against the requirements documentation.

Journal of Aircraft
California Polytechnic State University (US), University of Bristol (GB)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Aerospace and Aviation Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Automatic Judging for Precision Aerobatics — Artur Uzieblo, Thomas Richardson, et al. · Journal of Aircraft (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS