Decoding dissociation pathways of ligands in prolyl oligopeptidase

Neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's, pose a growing global health burden. Prolyl oligopeptidase (PREP) has emerged as a potential therapeutic target in these diseases. Recent studies have shown that direct interaction between PREP and pathological proteins, such as α-synuclein and Tau, influences protein aggregation and neuronal function. While most known PREP inhibitors primarily target its enzymatic functions, a new class of ligands, known as HUPs, specifically modulate protein-protein interactions (PPIs), which are crucial in the pathology of neurodegenerative diseases. These structurally distinct ligands exhibit diverse binding behaviors, highlighting the importance of understanding their binding pathways. In this study, we analyzed the binding pathways and stability of structurally diverse ligands using molecular dynamics simulations and enhanced sampling techniques. Traditional inhibitors, such as KYP-2047, target the active site between the catalytic domains of PREP and the β-propeller domain, while HUP ligands bind to alternative regions, such as the hinge site, potentially disrupting non-enzymatic PPIs. Using a PLUMED module called maze, we demonstrated that structural variations among ligands lead to distinct binding and unbinding pathways. Free-energy profiles from umbrella sampling revealed key kinetic bottlenecks and differences in pathway selection. For example, HUP-55 exhibits pathway hopping, characterized by diffuse exploration of binding regions before selecting an exit, while KYP-2047 strongly prefers the central tunnel of the β-propeller domain even under perturbations. These results suggest that the dynamic interaction between ligands and PREP plays a critical role in their mechanism of action. The ability of HUPs to interact with multiple binding sites and adapt to PREP's conformational changes may be essential for their PPI-targeting effects. This work highlights the need to consider both binding pathways and ligand dynamics in the design of next-generation ligands for PREP and related targets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1039/d5cp02804c
Primary Topic
Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decoding dissociation pathways of ligands in prolyl oligopeptidase

Jakub Rydzewski, Katarzyna Walczewska-Szewc
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis
article

Decoding dissociation pathways of ligands in prolyl oligopeptidase

Jakub Rydzewski, Katarzyna Walczewska-Szewc
article en

Abstract

Neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's, pose a growing global health burden. Prolyl oligopeptidase (PREP) has emerged as a potential therapeutic target in these diseases. Recent studies have shown that direct interaction between PREP and pathological proteins, such as α-synuclein and Tau, influences protein aggregation and neuronal function. While most known PREP inhibitors primarily target its enzymatic functions, a new class of ligands, known as HUPs, specifically modulate protein-protein interactions (PPIs), which are crucial in the pathology of neurodegenerative diseases. These structurally distinct ligands exhibit diverse binding behaviors, highlighting the importance of understanding their binding pathways. In this study, we analyzed the binding pathways and stability of structurally diverse ligands using molecular dynamics simulations and enhanced sampling techniques. Traditional inhibitors, such as KYP-2047, target the active site between the catalytic domains of PREP and the β-propeller domain, while HUP ligands bind to alternative regions, such as the hinge site, potentially disrupting non-enzymatic PPIs. Using a PLUMED module called maze, we demonstrated that structural variations among ligands lead to distinct binding and unbinding pathways. Free-energy profiles from umbrella sampling revealed key kinetic bottlenecks and differences in pathway selection. For example, HUP-55 exhibits pathway hopping, characterized by diffuse exploration of binding regions before selecting an exit, while KYP-2047 strongly prefers the central tunnel of the β-propeller domain even under perturbations. These results suggest that the dynamic interaction between ligands and PREP plays a critical role in their mechanism of action. The ability of HUPs to interact with multiple binding sites and adapt to PREP's conformational changes may be essential for their PPI-targeting effects. This work highlights the need to consider both binding pathways and ligand dynamics in the design of next-generation ligands for PREP and related targets.

Physical Chemistry Chemical PhysicsVol. 28(1)
Nicolaus Copernicus University (PL), Institute of Physics (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.