Accuracy of self-collection in human papillomavirus-based cervical screening: An evidence-based review

Many studies have demonstrated that self-collection is similar to clinician-collection for detecting clinically significant HPV infections. However, some general practitioners (GPs) still have concerns about self‑collection, including holding the misconception that self-collection is less accurate, possibly because of older studies that were undertaken using less sensitive testing technologies. Understanding self-collection accuracy, devices, quality control methods and the implications for general practice can encourage GPs to offer it to eligible patients, potentially engaging more patients in cervical screening, preventing devastating diagnoses, increasing equity and saving lives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of General Practice
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31128/ajgp-03-25-7585
Primary Topic
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accuracy of self-collection in human papillomavirus-based cervical screening: An evidence-based review

David Hawkes, Marion Saville, Rebecca L. Starkie, Syed Waqas Hassan
Australian Journal of General Practice
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
article

Accuracy of self-collection in human papillomavirus-based cervical screening: An evidence-based review

David Hawkes, Marion Saville, Rebecca L. Starkie, Syed Waqas Hassan
article en

Abstract

Many studies have demonstrated that self-collection is similar to clinician-collection for detecting clinically significant HPV infections. However, some general practitioners (GPs) still have concerns about self‑collection, including holding the misconception that self-collection is less accurate, possibly because of older studies that were undertaken using less sensitive testing technologies. Understanding self-collection accuracy, devices, quality control methods and the implications for general practice can encourage GPs to offer it to eligible patients, potentially engaging more patients in cervical screening, preventing devastating diagnoses, increasing equity and saving lives.

Australian Journal of General PracticeVol. 54(12)
The University of Melbourne (AU), Cancer Council Victoria (AU), Melbourne Bioinformatics (AU)
Australian Government
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.