Does a rising tide lift all boats?: Evidence from a multicity randomized trial of procedural justice in hot spots policing

Abstract A recent multicity procedural justice (PJ) training experiment at crime hot spots showed that police could be trained to behave in procedurally just ways, and that this behavioral change could lead to reductions in arrests, improved citizen evaluations of the police, and decreases in crime. In this paper, we extend analyses of the original study to identify whether improvements in PJ behavior in interactions with citizens were conditioned by race/ethnicity. Simply stated, do the improvements apply to all racial/ethnic groups, like a rising tide that lifts all boats, or do the benefits of the training program accrue inequitably across groups? Using systematic social observations of officer interactions with citizens, and mixed‐effects regression models that controlled for possible selection biases by officers, we do not find evidence of significant differing impacts across the groups. In concluding, we argue that PJ training for hot spots policing officers is a promising approach to increasing PJ in interactions across racial/ethnic groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Criminology
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.70025
Primary Topic
Policing Practices and Perceptions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does a rising tide lift all boats?: Evidence from a multicity randomized trial of procedural justice in hot spots policing

Kiseong Kuen, David L. Weisburd, Taryn Zastrow, Cody W. Telep
Criminology
Policing Practices and Perceptions
article

Does a rising tide lift all boats?: Evidence from a multicity randomized trial of procedural justice in hot spots policing

Kiseong Kuen, David L. Weisburd, Taryn Zastrow, Cody W. Telep
article en

Abstract

Abstract A recent multicity procedural justice (PJ) training experiment at crime hot spots showed that police could be trained to behave in procedurally just ways, and that this behavioral change could lead to reductions in arrests, improved citizen evaluations of the police, and decreases in crime. In this paper, we extend analyses of the original study to identify whether improvements in PJ behavior in interactions with citizens were conditioned by race/ethnicity. Simply stated, do the improvements apply to all racial/ethnic groups, like a rising tide that lifts all boats, or do the benefits of the training program accrue inequitably across groups? Using systematic social observations of officer interactions with citizens, and mixed‐effects regression models that controlled for possible selection biases by officers, we do not find evidence of significant differing impacts across the groups. In concluding, we argue that PJ training for hot spots policing officers is a promising approach to increasing PJ in interactions across racial/ethnic groups.

CriminologyVol. 64(1)
Australian Institute of Criminology (AU), Griffith University (AU), George Mason University (US), Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL), Arizona State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Policing Practices and Perceptions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.