Estimating the Economic Burden and Cost-benefit of Human Brucellosis Management under a One Health Framework in Occupationally Exposed Populations of Gujarat, India

The investigation was conducted during May–June, 2023 in 27 villages of Anand District, Gujarat, India to study the direct, indirect, and intangible costs associated with human brucellosis and evaluate the cost-benefit of a free treatment intervention implemented under a One Health framework. A retrospective, cross-sectional cost-of-illness study was conducted involving 50 individuals diagnosed with brucellosis. Participants were selected from four occupational categories: farmers, veterinarians, artificial insemination (AI) workers, and village resource persons (VRPs). Data were collected through structured interviews and categorized into direct costs (e.g., consultation, diagnostics, medicines, transportation), indirect costs (e.g., productivity losses), and intangible costs (e.g., mental stress, isolation), with all estimates reported in Indian Rupees (INR). Cost-benefit ratios (CBRs) were calculated using both average and median cost scenarios. Direct costs totalled to ` 319,598, with farmers incurring the highest burden. Indirect costs, largely due to productivity losses, amounted to ` 357,844, accounting for over half of the total disease burden. Mental distress was reported by 56% of respondents, highest among farmers (85.71%). Misdiagnosis was universal (100%) among those who sought initial treatment. The average CBR for the free treatment program was 2.9, indicating significant economic benefit. Median-based CBRs revealed the highest benefit for farmers (4.3) and VRPs (2.0), with lower returns for AI workers and veterinarians (1.1 each). Brucellosis imposes a substantial and uneven burden on rural occupational groups and this One Health model demonstrated strong cost-effectiveness and equity benefits. Broader implementation, along with early diagnosis and awareness efforts, is essential for effective disease control and livelihood protection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23910/1.2025.6605
Primary Topic
Brucella: diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating the Economic Burden and Cost-benefit of Human Brucellosis Management under a One Health Framework in Occupationally Exposed Populations of Gujarat, India

A. V. Harikumar, Sagar Shroff, Aditi Aditi, Suman Singh et al.
International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management
Brucella: diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment
article

Estimating the Economic Burden and Cost-benefit of Human Brucellosis Management under a One Health Framework in Occupationally Exposed Populations of Gujarat, India

A. V. Harikumar, Sagar Shroff, Aditi Aditi, Suman Singh, M. Shazleen
article en

Abstract

The investigation was conducted during May–June, 2023 in 27 villages of Anand District, Gujarat, India to study the direct, indirect, and intangible costs associated with human brucellosis and evaluate the cost-benefit of a free treatment intervention implemented under a One Health framework. A retrospective, cross-sectional cost-of-illness study was conducted involving 50 individuals diagnosed with brucellosis. Participants were selected from four occupational categories: farmers, veterinarians, artificial insemination (AI) workers, and village resource persons (VRPs). Data were collected through structured interviews and categorized into direct costs (e.g., consultation, diagnostics, medicines, transportation), indirect costs (e.g., productivity losses), and intangible costs (e.g., mental stress, isolation), with all estimates reported in Indian Rupees (INR). Cost-benefit ratios (CBRs) were calculated using both average and median cost scenarios. Direct costs totalled to ` 319,598, with farmers incurring the highest burden. Indirect costs, largely due to productivity losses, amounted to ` 357,844, accounting for over half of the total disease burden. Mental distress was reported by 56% of respondents, highest among farmers (85.71%). Misdiagnosis was universal (100%) among those who sought initial treatment. The average CBR for the free treatment program was 2.9, indicating significant economic benefit. Median-based CBRs revealed the highest benefit for farmers (4.3) and VRPs (2.0), with lower returns for AI workers and veterinarians (1.1 each). Brucellosis imposes a substantial and uneven burden on rural occupational groups and this One Health model demonstrated strong cost-effectiveness and equity benefits. Broader implementation, along with early diagnosis and awareness efforts, is essential for effective disease control and livelihood protection.

International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress ManagementVol. 16(Nov, 11)
Shree Krishna Hospital (IN), National Dairy Development Board (IN), Institute of Chartered Financial Analysts of India (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Brucella: diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.