Mixed Methods Evaluation of the Impact of Allied Health – Translating Research into Practice (AH-TRIP) Program on the Knowledge Translation Capacity of the Allied Health Workforce

Background: Knowledge translation (KT) in healthcare is a complex process. Building the KT capacity of the workforce is fundamental to closing the gaps between research and evidence-based practice. This evaluation aimed to describe the impact of a KT capacity building program (Allied Health Translating Research into Practice, AH-TRIP) on allied health professionals and health services and systems, with the secondary aim of identifying barriers and enablers to program impact. Methods: Multi methods evaluation using online surveys and semi-structured interviews with 20 program participants and their managers. The interview guide was underpinned by the Framework to Assess the Impact from Translational health research (FAIT). Deductive content analysis was used to categorise impact against FAIT, with barriers and enablers mapped to an implementation framework. Results: Six domains of impact were identified: Individual Capacity Building, Workforce Capacity Building, Enhanced Networks, Clinical Practice Change, Patient/Community Benefits, and Economic Benefits. Enablers of impact were program design (flexibility, access to mentors, funding opportunities), local contexts supporting research (manager support, access to local experts), and previous exposure to KT. Consistent barriers included a lack of clinician time and confidence in KT, staff turnover (particularly in regional/rural areas), lack of organisational research culture, and short-term funding cycles. Conclusion: Using FAIT methodology, we have demonstrated significant impact achieved by a KT capacity building program for individual health professionals and the broader allied health workforce and health services and systems. Impact could be further optimised by strategies targeted at managers to create supportive contexts for KT through improving research literacy in health decision and policy contexts and innovative workforce planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.8910
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mixed Methods Evaluation of the Impact of Allied Health – Translating Research into Practice (AH-TRIP) Program on the Knowledge Translation Capacity of the Allied Health Workforce

Katrina L. Campbell, Alita Rushton, Kathryn McFarlane, Gill Harvey et al.
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Mixed Methods Evaluation of the Impact of Allied Health – Translating Research into Practice (AH-TRIP) Program on the Knowledge Translation Capacity of the Allied Health Workforce

Katrina L. Campbell, Alita Rushton, Kathryn McFarlane, Gill Harvey, Adrienne Young, Rachelle Pitt, Ingrid J. Hickman, Shelley Ann Wilkinson, Nina Meloncelli, A. Cameron
article en

Abstract

Background: Knowledge translation (KT) in healthcare is a complex process. Building the KT capacity of the workforce is fundamental to closing the gaps between research and evidence-based practice. This evaluation aimed to describe the impact of a KT capacity building program (Allied Health Translating Research into Practice, AH-TRIP) on allied health professionals and health services and systems, with the secondary aim of identifying barriers and enablers to program impact. Methods: Multi methods evaluation using online surveys and semi-structured interviews with 20 program participants and their managers. The interview guide was underpinned by the Framework to Assess the Impact from Translational health research (FAIT). Deductive content analysis was used to categorise impact against FAIT, with barriers and enablers mapped to an implementation framework. Results: Six domains of impact were identified: Individual Capacity Building, Workforce Capacity Building, Enhanced Networks, Clinical Practice Change, Patient/Community Benefits, and Economic Benefits. Enablers of impact were program design (flexibility, access to mentors, funding opportunities), local contexts supporting research (manager support, access to local experts), and previous exposure to KT. Consistent barriers included a lack of clinician time and confidence in KT, staff turnover (particularly in regional/rural areas), lack of organisational research culture, and short-term funding cycles. Conclusion: Using FAIT methodology, we have demonstrated significant impact achieved by a KT capacity building program for individual health professionals and the broader allied health workforce and health services and systems. Impact could be further optimised by strategies targeted at managers to create supportive contexts for KT through improving research literacy in health decision and policy contexts and innovative workforce planning.

International Journal of Health Policy and ManagementVol. 14
Griffith University (AU), Queensland Health (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), Flinders University (AU), Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital (AU), Cairns Hospital (AU), Metro South Health (AU), Mater Mothers' Hospital (AU)
Queensland Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.