Behavioral economics of climate action

Behavioral economics plays a key role in explaining the lack of current climate action and in facilitating effective future interventions. For instance, it can help us evaluate the efficacy and efficiency of policy instruments and institutions, understand the effectiveness of “hard” and “soft” interventions, and estimate pro-environmental preferences. In this editorial, we provide examples for some of the contributions of behavioral economics to the study of climate action and review the eight studies published in this collection. These studies introduce “social tipping points”, study related aspects of international organizations, explore the relationship between pro-environmental behaviors and individual well-being, investigate the effect of “Veggie Days” on emissions in German university cafeterias, test whether an intervention can increase the adoption of certified solar devices for refugees in Uganda, conduct a systematic review and a meta-analysis of public support for carbon pricing policies, examine arguments for and against the use of pricing instruments to mitigate emissions, and analyze social media communications of three groups of stakeholders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Climate Action
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-025-00291-w
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Behavioral economics of climate action

Till Requate, Israel Waichman, Gernot Wagner
npj Climate Action
Climate Change Communication and Perception
article

Behavioral economics of climate action

Till Requate, Israel Waichman, Gernot Wagner
article en

Abstract

Behavioral economics plays a key role in explaining the lack of current climate action and in facilitating effective future interventions. For instance, it can help us evaluate the efficacy and efficiency of policy instruments and institutions, understand the effectiveness of “hard” and “soft” interventions, and estimate pro-environmental preferences. In this editorial, we provide examples for some of the contributions of behavioral economics to the study of climate action and review the eight studies published in this collection. These studies introduce “social tipping points”, study related aspects of international organizations, explore the relationship between pro-environmental behaviors and individual well-being, investigate the effect of “Veggie Days” on emissions in German university cafeterias, test whether an intervention can increase the adoption of certified solar devices for refugees in Uganda, conduct a systematic review and a meta-analysis of public support for carbon pricing policies, examine arguments for and against the use of pricing instruments to mitigate emissions, and analyze social media communications of three groups of stakeholders.

npj Climate ActionVol. 4(1)
Bard College Berlin (DE), Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE), Columbia University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Behavioral economics of climate action — Till Requate, Israel Waichman, et al. · npj Climate Action (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS