Portable perimetry devices for glaucoma patients –practicality in daily clinical practice and glaucoma expert assessment
Both novel tests closely corroborated the standard bowl perimetry measurements. The diagnostic agreement was very high for the virtual reality-perimeter and moderate to high for the tablet-based perimetry, Melbourne Rapid fields. Based on our questionnaire, most glaucoma experts would recommend a follow-up with either method with a strong preference for the virtual reality head-mounted device.
Authors
- Esther M. Hoffmann (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0949-4268)
- Algis J. Vingrys (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5920-4604)
- Sven Dinslage
- Hanne Irle
- Randolf A. Widder (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7487-1501)
- Alexandra Lappas
- André Rosentreter (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5352-9931)
- Philip Enders (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9527-4957)
- Yu Xiang George Kong (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0522-3046)
- Jan Niklas Lüke (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7131-7652)
- Claus Cursiefen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1958-411X)
- Silvia Schrittenlocher (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6090-6777)
- Jithmi Weliwitage (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6596-6680)
- Vincent Lüke
- Jan Lübke
- Thomas S. Dietlein
Institutions
- Witten/Herdecke University (DE)
- University of Freiburg (DE)
- University of Cologne (DE)
- Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
- Australian College of Optometry (AU)
- Düsseldorf University Hospital (DE)
- The Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital (AU)
- Centre for Eye Research Australia (AU)
- Helios Universitätsklinikum Wuppertal (DE)
- University Hospital Cologne (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
- Published
- 2025-12-04
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-025-07028-9
- Primary Topic
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00