Neochota odvolacích soudů doplňovat dokazování jako příčina nepřiměřené délky civilního řízení

The excessive length of civil proceedings is a current issue not only in the Czech civil process. Ensuring a reasonable length of civil proceedings is a fundamental duty of a democratic state governed by the rule of law, which is therefore obliged to identify and eliminate the causes of the prolongation of civil proceedings. This paper focuses on one of these causes, namely the conduct of the appellate courts, which consists in their reluctance to complete evidence in the appellate proceedings. The aim of this paper is to propose measures to eliminate this cause while respecting the procedural rights of the parties and to assess its potential impact on the length of civil proceedings.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
AUC IURIDICA
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2025.678
Primary Topic
Ombudsman and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neochota odvolacích soudů doplňovat dokazování jako příčina nepřiměřené délky civilního řízení

Petr Toman
AUC IURIDICA
Ombudsman and Human Rights
article

Neochota odvolacích soudů doplňovat dokazování jako příčina nepřiměřené délky civilního řízení

Petr Toman
article en

Abstract

The excessive length of civil proceedings is a current issue not only in the Czech civil process. Ensuring a reasonable length of civil proceedings is a fundamental duty of a democratic state governed by the rule of law, which is therefore obliged to identify and eliminate the causes of the prolongation of civil proceedings. This paper focuses on one of these causes, namely the conduct of the appellate courts, which consists in their reluctance to complete evidence in the appellate proceedings. The aim of this paper is to propose measures to eliminate this cause while respecting the procedural rights of the parties and to assess its potential impact on the length of civil proceedings.

AUC IURIDICAVol. 71(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Ombudsman and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.