Mantinely pro užívání výslovných environmentálních tvrzení včetně těch se zaměřením na klima

The article addresses the boundaries for the use of explicit environmental claims, which are a prevalent instrument in the communication between competitors and consumers. However, these claims frequently exhibit indications of greenwashing. In the first part of the article, the occurrence and potentially problematic nature of environmental claims are presented, as reflected in the decision-making practice of courts and competent authorities of European Union Member States, particularly in the Federal Republic of Germany. In the second part of the article, this is followed by an analysis of the Czech legal framework, which, despite the absence of explicit regulation, enables the addressing of misleading claims through the regulation of unfair commercial practices and unfair competition. The third part of the article is devoted to an examination of the amendment to the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive and the proposal for a Green Claims Directive. The fourth part of the article focuses on climate claims, a subset of environmental claims. These claims are subject to stricter requirements under legislation of European Union and German case law. These requirements may also serve as a point of inspiration for the Czech legal context.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
AUC IURIDICA
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2025.675
Primary Topic
Environmental law and policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mantinely pro užívání výslovných environmentálních tvrzení včetně těch se zaměřením na klima

Magdalena Hamáčková
AUC IURIDICA
Environmental law and policy
article

Mantinely pro užívání výslovných environmentálních tvrzení včetně těch se zaměřením na klima

Magdalena Hamáčková
article en

Abstract

The article addresses the boundaries for the use of explicit environmental claims, which are a prevalent instrument in the communication between competitors and consumers. However, these claims frequently exhibit indications of greenwashing. In the first part of the article, the occurrence and potentially problematic nature of environmental claims are presented, as reflected in the decision-making practice of courts and competent authorities of European Union Member States, particularly in the Federal Republic of Germany. In the second part of the article, this is followed by an analysis of the Czech legal framework, which, despite the absence of explicit regulation, enables the addressing of misleading claims through the regulation of unfair commercial practices and unfair competition. The third part of the article is devoted to an examination of the amendment to the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive and the proposal for a Green Claims Directive. The fourth part of the article focuses on climate claims, a subset of environmental claims. These claims are subject to stricter requirements under legislation of European Union and German case law. These requirements may also serve as a point of inspiration for the Czech legal context.

AUC IURIDICAVol. 71(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Environmental law and policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Mantinely pro užívání výslovných environmentálních tvrzení včetně těch se zaměřením na klima — Magdalena Hamáčková · AUC IURIDICA (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS