Rozhodnutí o úpadku a zálohy na odměnu insolvenčního správce za přihlášky pohledávek

The authors discuss the fragmented practice of insolvency courts in the issue of advances on insolvency administrators’ remuneration for the review of applications for claims after the adoption of the so-called transposition amendment to the Insolvency Act effective from October 2024. The risk of incomplete reimbursement of this segment of remuneration after the end of the discharge from debt procedure has led to the development of various solutions that motivate or force the debtor to pay special advances on remuneration for the review of applications for claims in the phase from the authorisation to the approval of the insolvency arrangement. Across all insolvency courts, four basic models of access to advances have been developed – (i) repayments from disposable income without deductions, (ii) deductions without the imposition of special advances, (iii) deductions combined with fixed monthly chargeable advances, and (iv) deductions combined with fixed advances derived from the actual number of claims filed.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
AUC IURIDICA
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2025.679
Primary Topic
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rozhodnutí o úpadku a zálohy na odměnu insolvenčního správce za přihlášky pohledávek

Zdeněk Strnad, Martin Slobodník, Ondřej Zezulka
AUC IURIDICA
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
article

Rozhodnutí o úpadku a zálohy na odměnu insolvenčního správce za přihlášky pohledávek

Zdeněk Strnad, Martin Slobodník, Ondřej Zezulka
article en

Abstract

The authors discuss the fragmented practice of insolvency courts in the issue of advances on insolvency administrators’ remuneration for the review of applications for claims after the adoption of the so-called transposition amendment to the Insolvency Act effective from October 2024. The risk of incomplete reimbursement of this segment of remuneration after the end of the discharge from debt procedure has led to the development of various solutions that motivate or force the debtor to pay special advances on remuneration for the review of applications for claims in the phase from the authorisation to the approval of the insolvency arrangement. Across all insolvency courts, four basic models of access to advances have been developed – (i) repayments from disposable income without deductions, (ii) deductions without the imposition of special advances, (iii) deductions combined with fixed monthly chargeable advances, and (iv) deductions combined with fixed advances derived from the actual number of claims filed.

AUC IURIDICAVol. 71(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Rozhodnutí o úpadku a zálohy na odměnu insolvenčního správce za přihlášky pohledávek — Zdeněk Strnad, Martin Slobodník, et al. · AUC IURIDICA (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS