Duty to Protect Motherland v. Men's Life, in Times of War: International Standards and Ukrainian Mistakes, as Caution for European Countries

From the start of the full-scale aggression of Russian troops into Ukrainian territory, European countries faced a real risk of invasion and should be prepared for war. After almost three years of resistance, the Ukrainian nation sacrificed hundreds of thousands of lives of its bravest sons, but not all of them were ready to die. Ukrainian governmental actions do not leave most Ukrainian men a chance to leave the country or refuse to go and die on the battlefield. Violating international principles and Ukrainian legislation provisions, the Ukrainian authority chose state security instead of men’s right to life and continues to do so. Such examples should be analysed and discussed to prevent similar human rights violations if war breaks out in European countries in the near future. Having similar constitutional provisions, some European countries are at real risk of repeating Ukrainian mistakes, so they should analyse their national legislation, using the Ukrainian example, to avoid human rights violations in the case of a future war in Europe.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
AUC IURIDICA
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2025.683
Primary Topic
War, Law, and Justice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Duty to Protect Motherland v. Men's Life, in Times of War: International Standards and Ukrainian Mistakes, as Caution for European Countries

Sergiy Panasyuk
AUC IURIDICA
War, Law, and Justice
article

Duty to Protect Motherland v. Men's Life, in Times of War: International Standards and Ukrainian Mistakes, as Caution for European Countries

Sergiy Panasyuk
article en

Abstract

From the start of the full-scale aggression of Russian troops into Ukrainian territory, European countries faced a real risk of invasion and should be prepared for war. After almost three years of resistance, the Ukrainian nation sacrificed hundreds of thousands of lives of its bravest sons, but not all of them were ready to die. Ukrainian governmental actions do not leave most Ukrainian men a chance to leave the country or refuse to go and die on the battlefield. Violating international principles and Ukrainian legislation provisions, the Ukrainian authority chose state security instead of men’s right to life and continues to do so. Such examples should be analysed and discussed to prevent similar human rights violations if war breaks out in European countries in the near future. Having similar constitutional provisions, some European countries are at real risk of repeating Ukrainian mistakes, so they should analyse their national legislation, using the Ukrainian example, to avoid human rights violations in the case of a future war in Europe.

AUC IURIDICAVol. 71(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
War, Law, and Justice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.