From innovation <i>versus</i> equity to innovation <i>and</i> equity

Abstract The essays in the special issue reframe the relationship between innovation and equity, not as opposing objectives but as mutually constitutive design choices. Drawing together contributions at the levels of the workplace, city, region, and nation, they emphasize how outcomes depend less on market or technological inevitabilities than on practices situated in places. The essays converge on the insight that innovation systems are inherently political, shaped by institutions, governance, and collective action. Yet they also surface unsettled questions: how equity at one scale may undermine it at another, how to govern multi-actor systems such as data and surveillance, how to stabilize inclusive arrangements over time, and how to measure intangible assets and civic participation alongside wages or GDP. The task ahead is to design across levels, institutions, and metrics to recognize equity not as a constraint but as a source of resilience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Industrial and Corporate Change
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtaf057
Primary Topic
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From innovation versus equity to innovation and equity

Walter W. Powell
Industrial and Corporate Change
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
article

From innovation versus equity to innovation and equity

Walter W. Powell
article en

Abstract

Abstract The essays in the special issue reframe the relationship between innovation and equity, not as opposing objectives but as mutually constitutive design choices. Drawing together contributions at the levels of the workplace, city, region, and nation, they emphasize how outcomes depend less on market or technological inevitabilities than on practices situated in places. The essays converge on the insight that innovation systems are inherently political, shaped by institutions, governance, and collective action. Yet they also surface unsettled questions: how equity at one scale may undermine it at another, how to govern multi-actor systems such as data and surveillance, how to stabilize inclusive arrangements over time, and how to measure intangible assets and civic participation alongside wages or GDP. The task ahead is to design across levels, institutions, and metrics to recognize equity not as a constraint but as a source of resilience.

Industrial and Corporate ChangeVol. 35(1)
Stanford Medicine (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.