Negative dependence in knockout tournaments

Abstract Negative dependence in tournaments has received attention in the literature. The property of negative orthant dependence (NOD) was proved for different tournament models with a special proof for each model. For general round-robin tournaments and knockout tournaments with random draws, Malinovsky and Rinott (2023) unified and simplified many existing results in the literature by proving a stronger property, negative association (NA). For a knockout tournament with a non-random draw, they presented an example to illustrate that ${\boldsymbol{S}}$ is NOD but not NA. However, their proof is not correct. In this paper, we establish the properties of negative regression dependence (NRD), negative left-tail dependence (NLTD), and negative right-tail dependence (NRTD) for a knockout tournament with a random draw and with players being of equal strength. For a knockout tournament with a non-random draw and with equal strength, we prove that ${\boldsymbol{S}}$ is NA and NRTD, while ${\boldsymbol{S}}$ is, in general, not NRD or NLTD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Probability
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/jpr.2025.10043
Primary Topic
Game Theory and Voting Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Negative dependence in knockout tournaments

Yuting Su, Taizhong Hu, Zhenfeng Zou
Journal of Applied Probability
Game Theory and Voting Systems
article

Negative dependence in knockout tournaments

Yuting Su, Taizhong Hu, Zhenfeng Zou
article en

Abstract

Abstract Negative dependence in tournaments has received attention in the literature. The property of negative orthant dependence (NOD) was proved for different tournament models with a special proof for each model. For general round-robin tournaments and knockout tournaments with random draws, Malinovsky and Rinott (2023) unified and simplified many existing results in the literature by proving a stronger property, negative association (NA). For a knockout tournament with a non-random draw, they presented an example to illustrate that ${\boldsymbol{S}}$ is NOD but not NA. However, their proof is not correct. In this paper, we establish the properties of negative regression dependence (NRD), negative left-tail dependence (NLTD), and negative right-tail dependence (NRTD) for a knockout tournament with a random draw and with players being of equal strength. For a knockout tournament with a non-random draw and with equal strength, we prove that ${\boldsymbol{S}}$ is NA and NRTD, while ${\boldsymbol{S}}$ is, in general, not NRD or NLTD.

Journal of Applied Probability
University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Game Theory and Voting Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.