Medial pulvinar stereoelectroencephalographic biomarkers associated with deep brain stimulation response in focal drug‐resistant epilepsy

Thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) represents an emerging therapeutic option for patients with focal drug-resistant epilepsy who are ineligible for or have failed resective surgery. To optimize outcomes and guide DBS lead placement, thalamic stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) has been proposed. This monocentric retrospective study aimed to identify interictal and ictal SEEG biomarkers of the medial pulvinar (PuM) associated with favorable PuM-DBS response. Six patients (four female, two male) underwent SEEG including PuM sampling, were deemed unsuitable for resective surgery, and subsequently received bilateral PuM-DBS. In total, eight PuMs were sampled in SEEG: four bilaterally (two patients) and four unilaterally (four patients). The SEEG exploration covered both the PuM and the ipsilateral epileptogenic zone network (EZN) in four patients, whereas in the other two the EZN was bilateral but PuM sampling was unilateral. All SEEG signal analyses were performed on the PuM sampling contacts available in each patient. Interictal SEEG analysis included spike rates and nonlinear functional connectivity (h2), whereas ictal analyses combined visual inspection with quantitative biomarkers: epileptogenicity index (EI), connectivity epileptogenicity index (cEI), permutation entropy index (PEI), and delta entropy (ΔE). Two patients were responders (≥50% seizure reduction at 1 year). PuM spike rates, connectivity, and EI and cEI values did not differentiate responders from nonresponders. In contrast, entropy-based measures were significantly higher in responders: PEI (false discovery rate [FDR]-p = .024) and ΔE (FDR-p = .034). These findings suggest that ictal PuM complexity disruption, quantified through entropy-based SEEG metrics (PEI and ΔE), may represent a candidate biomarker of response to medial pulvinar DBS and warrants validation in larger cohorts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Epilepsia
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.70046
Primary Topic
Neurological disorders and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Medial pulvinar stereoelectroencephalographic biomarkers associated with deep brain stimulation response in focal drug‐resistant epilepsy

Francesca Pizzo, Samuel Médina Villalon, Ionuț‐Flavius Bratu, Fabrice Bartoloméi et al.
Epilepsia
Neurological disorders and treatments
article

Medial pulvinar stereoelectroencephalographic biomarkers associated with deep brain stimulation response in focal drug‐resistant epilepsy

Francesca Pizzo, Samuel Médina Villalon, Ionuț‐Flavius Bratu, Fabrice Bartoloméi, Romain Carron, A. Clément
article en

Abstract

Thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) represents an emerging therapeutic option for patients with focal drug-resistant epilepsy who are ineligible for or have failed resective surgery. To optimize outcomes and guide DBS lead placement, thalamic stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) has been proposed. This monocentric retrospective study aimed to identify interictal and ictal SEEG biomarkers of the medial pulvinar (PuM) associated with favorable PuM-DBS response. Six patients (four female, two male) underwent SEEG including PuM sampling, were deemed unsuitable for resective surgery, and subsequently received bilateral PuM-DBS. In total, eight PuMs were sampled in SEEG: four bilaterally (two patients) and four unilaterally (four patients). The SEEG exploration covered both the PuM and the ipsilateral epileptogenic zone network (EZN) in four patients, whereas in the other two the EZN was bilateral but PuM sampling was unilateral. All SEEG signal analyses were performed on the PuM sampling contacts available in each patient. Interictal SEEG analysis included spike rates and nonlinear functional connectivity (h2), whereas ictal analyses combined visual inspection with quantitative biomarkers: epileptogenicity index (EI), connectivity epileptogenicity index (cEI), permutation entropy index (PEI), and delta entropy (ΔE). Two patients were responders (≥50% seizure reduction at 1 year). PuM spike rates, connectivity, and EI and cEI values did not differentiate responders from nonresponders. In contrast, entropy-based measures were significantly higher in responders: PEI (false discovery rate [FDR]-p = .024) and ΔE (FDR-p = .034). These findings suggest that ictal PuM complexity disruption, quantified through entropy-based SEEG metrics (PEI and ΔE), may represent a candidate biomarker of response to medial pulvinar DBS and warrants validation in larger cohorts.

EpilepsiaVol. 67(1)
Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes (FR), Hôpital de la Timone (FR)
Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Neurological disorders and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.