The evolution of the complete blood count: have we gone too far?

The complete blood count (CBC) began its evolution at the end of the 19th century with the development of the hemacytometer to count blood cells. Soon thereafter, the hematocrit, a method to determine the packed red cell volume, was described in Sweden. Eventually, the mean volume and hemoglobin content of red cells were added. Stains that distinguished individual leukocyte types permitted differential white cell counts: the product of the total white cell count and the fraction of each white cell type. A reliable means to count platelets rounded out the manual CBC. In 1954, Wallace Coulter introduced the Model A electronic particle counter. Modifications and advancements evolved into the Model S, a rapid, accurate, electronic method to determine the standard variables in the CBC and an array of additional measurements. Electronic particle counting has undergone numerous further developments including the application of florescence technology, such that approximately 30 variables can be measured as part of a CBC. This evolution has led to a chaotic situation; a recent study showed that the CBC ranged from 12 to over 24 variables when measured at either community or academic hospital hematology laboratories. Out-of-range values, frequent and often trivial, have to be reconciled for patient and physician. Redundant and very low value variables have accrued in the CBC. We propose a major change in the CBC depending on the reason for its measurement. These recommendations markedly decrease the variables measured and make the results more impactful, which will enhance the physician's focus on the use of this key laboratory test to the benefit of the patient's care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Haematologica
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2025.300032
Primary Topic
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The evolution of the complete blood count: have we gone too far?

Marshall A. Lichtman, Richard W. Burack
Haematologica
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
article

The evolution of the complete blood count: have we gone too far?

Marshall A. Lichtman, Richard W. Burack
article en

Abstract

The complete blood count (CBC) began its evolution at the end of the 19th century with the development of the hemacytometer to count blood cells. Soon thereafter, the hematocrit, a method to determine the packed red cell volume, was described in Sweden. Eventually, the mean volume and hemoglobin content of red cells were added. Stains that distinguished individual leukocyte types permitted differential white cell counts: the product of the total white cell count and the fraction of each white cell type. A reliable means to count platelets rounded out the manual CBC. In 1954, Wallace Coulter introduced the Model A electronic particle counter. Modifications and advancements evolved into the Model S, a rapid, accurate, electronic method to determine the standard variables in the CBC and an array of additional measurements. Electronic particle counting has undergone numerous further developments including the application of florescence technology, such that approximately 30 variables can be measured as part of a CBC. This evolution has led to a chaotic situation; a recent study showed that the CBC ranged from 12 to over 24 variables when measured at either community or academic hospital hematology laboratories. Out-of-range values, frequent and often trivial, have to be reconciled for patient and physician. Redundant and very low value variables have accrued in the CBC. We propose a major change in the CBC depending on the reason for its measurement. These recommendations markedly decrease the variables measured and make the results more impactful, which will enhance the physician's focus on the use of this key laboratory test to the benefit of the patient's care.

Haematologica
University of Rochester Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.