Tobacco and Cannabis Use and co-Use, and Cannabis Refusal Self-Efficacy Among Black Men: A Cross-Sectional Study Examining Differences Between Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM) and Non-MSM

Cannabis and tobacco co-use is a public health concern among men who have sex with men (MSM), including Black MSM. Because many Black men initiate tobacco use with cannabis, identifying predictors of cannabis use is important. This study hypothesized that Black MSM would report more cannabis and tobacco use and lower cannabis refusal self-efficacy than Black non-MSM due to stress from their multiple minority status. The study compared Black MSM and non-MSM on substance use behaviors and perceptions. Guided by minority stress theory, path analysis tested whether indirect effects of MSM status on tobacco use operated through cannabis refusal self-efficacy and cannabis use. Participants were 202 Black men ages 18-34 (108 non-MSM; 94 MSM). In the past 30 days, 68 reported tobacco use, 121 reported cannabis use, and 62 reported co-use. MSM reported more tobacco and cannabis use and lower cannabis refusal self-efficacy than non-MSM. Several indirect effects were identified, including pathways between MSM status and cannabis use through cannabis refusal self-efficacy, between cannabis refusal self-efficacy and tobacco use through cannabis use, and sequential indirect effects between MSM status and tobacco use through both mechanisms. The results suggest harm reduction strategies for Black MSM should address co-use patterns and strengthen cannabis refusal self-efficacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Substance Use & Misuse
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2025.2592877
Primary Topic
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tobacco and Cannabis Use and co-Use, and Cannabis Refusal Self-Efficacy Among Black Men: A Cross-Sectional Study Examining Differences Between Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM) and Non-MSM

Jaelen Owens, Laura Hoyt D’Anna, Kyle Chang, Jefferson Wood
Substance Use & Misuse
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
article

Tobacco and Cannabis Use and co-Use, and Cannabis Refusal Self-Efficacy Among Black Men: A Cross-Sectional Study Examining Differences Between Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM) and Non-MSM

Jaelen Owens, Laura Hoyt D’Anna, Kyle Chang, Jefferson Wood
article en

Abstract

Cannabis and tobacco co-use is a public health concern among men who have sex with men (MSM), including Black MSM. Because many Black men initiate tobacco use with cannabis, identifying predictors of cannabis use is important. This study hypothesized that Black MSM would report more cannabis and tobacco use and lower cannabis refusal self-efficacy than Black non-MSM due to stress from their multiple minority status. The study compared Black MSM and non-MSM on substance use behaviors and perceptions. Guided by minority stress theory, path analysis tested whether indirect effects of MSM status on tobacco use operated through cannabis refusal self-efficacy and cannabis use. Participants were 202 Black men ages 18-34 (108 non-MSM; 94 MSM). In the past 30 days, 68 reported tobacco use, 121 reported cannabis use, and 62 reported co-use. MSM reported more tobacco and cannabis use and lower cannabis refusal self-efficacy than non-MSM. Several indirect effects were identified, including pathways between MSM status and cannabis use through cannabis refusal self-efficacy, between cannabis refusal self-efficacy and tobacco use through cannabis use, and sequential indirect effects between MSM status and tobacco use through both mechanisms. The results suggest harm reduction strategies for Black MSM should address co-use patterns and strengthen cannabis refusal self-efficacy.

Substance Use & Misuse
Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.