Co‐textual dopes: How <scp>LLMs</scp> produce contextually appropriate text in chat interactions with humans without access to context

Abstract This paper asks how LLM‐based systems can produce text that is taken as contextually appropriate by humans without having seen text in its broader context. To understand how this is possible, context and co‐text have to be distinguished. Co‐text is input to LLMs during training and at inference as well as the primary resource of sense‐making for humans in interaction, collaboratively produced by both human and machine during chat. Systems can also passively participate in contextualization, insofar as cues are found in the co‐text and the user guides the system as to what is the appropriate context for them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Linguistic Anthropology
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jola.70036
Primary Topic
Speech and dialogue systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Co‐textual dopes: How LLMs produce contextually appropriate text in chat interactions with humans without access to context

Ole Pütz
Journal of Linguistic Anthropology
Speech and dialogue systems
article

Co‐textual dopes: How LLMs produce contextually appropriate text in chat interactions with humans without access to context

Ole Pütz
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper asks how LLM‐based systems can produce text that is taken as contextually appropriate by humans without having seen text in its broader context. To understand how this is possible, context and co‐text have to be distinguished. Co‐text is input to LLMs during training and at inference as well as the primary resource of sense‐making for humans in interaction, collaboratively produced by both human and machine during chat. Systems can also passively participate in contextualization, insofar as cues are found in the co‐text and the user guides the system as to what is the appropriate context for them.

Journal of Linguistic AnthropologyVol. 36(1)
Bielefeld University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Speech and dialogue systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.