Corneal Sensitivity with the Non-contact Esthesiometer as Compared to the Cotton Wisp Test in Patients with Ocular Surface Diseases

Our results demonstrate that the low specificity of the qualitative CW test, combined with a broad confidence interval, indicates a high likelihood of false-positive results. This suggests that a positive CW test may not reliably rule out hyposensitivity, underscoring the need for further evaluation in the setting of a positive CW test result.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ophthalmology and Therapy
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-025-01284-y
Primary Topic
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Corneal Sensitivity with the Non-contact Esthesiometer as Compared to the Cotton Wisp Test in Patients with Ocular Surface Diseases

Ana Balbuena-Pareja, Onur Ölçücü, Neslihan Dilruba Köseoğlu, Pedram Hamrah et al.
Ophthalmology and Therapy
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
article

Corneal Sensitivity with the Non-contact Esthesiometer as Compared to the Cotton Wisp Test in Patients with Ocular Surface Diseases

Ana Balbuena-Pareja, Onur Ölçücü, Neslihan Dilruba Köseoğlu, Pedram Hamrah, Stephanie Cox, Luiz Luciano Lamazales
article en

Abstract

Our results demonstrate that the low specificity of the qualitative CW test, combined with a broad confidence interval, indicates a high likelihood of false-positive results. This suggests that a positive CW test may not reliably rule out hyposensitivity, underscoring the need for further evaluation in the setting of a positive CW test result.

Ophthalmology and TherapyVol. 15(1)
Tufts University (US), Tufts Medical Center (US), University of South Florida (US), Alcon (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.