Factors influencing language teachers’ judgements and decision-making about the use of generative AI tools: A systematic review

Making practical-evaluative judgements and decisions is an increasingly important aspect of teacher agency with GenAI tools. However, little is known about factors that influence teachers' agentic decisions about integrating GenAI into teaching and assessment. This systematic review examines 14 empirical studies published between 2017 and 2025 through the lens of language teacher agency. The results indicate various factors that impact teachers' judgements and decisions and highlight professional development programs that can enhance this competence. The findings have implications for research, practice, and policies to enhance teachers’ agentic decision-making in GenAI-integrated learning environments. • Literature on language teachers in the context of Generative AI tools is reviewed. • Empirical studies are analysed through the lens of teacher agency. • Factors impacting practical-evaluative judgements and decisions are synthesised. • Programs and approaches that enhance agentic decision-making are discussed. • Insights for research, teacher education programs, and policies are provided.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Teaching and Teacher Education
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.105333
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors influencing language teachers’ judgements and decision-making about the use of generative AI tools: A systematic review

Sima Mohammadi
1 citations
Teaching and Teacher Education
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
2.48
article

Factors influencing language teachers’ judgements and decision-making about the use of generative AI tools: A systematic review

Sima Mohammadi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Making practical-evaluative judgements and decisions is an increasingly important aspect of teacher agency with GenAI tools. However, little is known about factors that influence teachers' agentic decisions about integrating GenAI into teaching and assessment. This systematic review examines 14 empirical studies published between 2017 and 2025 through the lens of language teacher agency. The results indicate various factors that impact teachers' judgements and decisions and highlight professional development programs that can enhance this competence. The findings have implications for research, practice, and policies to enhance teachers’ agentic decision-making in GenAI-integrated learning environments. • Literature on language teachers in the context of Generative AI tools is reviewed. • Empirical studies are analysed through the lens of teacher agency. • Factors impacting practical-evaluative judgements and decisions are synthesised. • Programs and approaches that enhance agentic decision-making are discussed. • Insights for research, teacher education programs, and policies are provided.

Teaching and Teacher EducationVol. 171
Deakin University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.