‘The wild-goose is more of a cosmopolite than we’: encountering the untranslatable, becoming cosmopolitan

Abstract Taking Dewey's cosmopolitan call as a point of departure, this paper attends to another voice of American philosophy—that of Henry D. Thoreau, as revived by Stanley Cavell. I try to read Cavell's ‘Walden in Tokyo' as an exemplification of his ordinary language philosophy in its cross-cultural dimensions. Cavell's discussion invites the reader to reconsider what we mean by ‘understanding' ‘different' ‘cultures'. My hope is to show in the process the point of the title of Cavell's essay. Among the various entry points to cultural and cross-cultural matters I consider, a particular focus is given to Cavell’s idea of philosophy as translation. As a broader implication of this, I draw out an alternative possibility of becoming cosmopolitan: what happens in the very moment of encountering the untranslatable provides us with an occasion for the transfiguration of our lives. We cannot encounter different cultures as other cultures if we remain fixed within expectations of reciprocal interaction. The teaching of Walden is always indirect, and its purpose is not to moralize about the virtues of acknowledging differences and mutual understanding. This has implications for the education of global citizenship.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Philosophy of Education
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jopedu/qhaf076
Primary Topic
Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘The wild-goose is more of a cosmopolite than we’: encountering the untranslatable, becoming cosmopolitan

Naoko Saito
Journal of Philosophy of Education
Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
article

‘The wild-goose is more of a cosmopolite than we’: encountering the untranslatable, becoming cosmopolitan

Naoko Saito
article en

Abstract

Abstract Taking Dewey's cosmopolitan call as a point of departure, this paper attends to another voice of American philosophy—that of Henry D. Thoreau, as revived by Stanley Cavell. I try to read Cavell's ‘Walden in Tokyo' as an exemplification of his ordinary language philosophy in its cross-cultural dimensions. Cavell's discussion invites the reader to reconsider what we mean by ‘understanding' ‘different' ‘cultures'. My hope is to show in the process the point of the title of Cavell's essay. Among the various entry points to cultural and cross-cultural matters I consider, a particular focus is given to Cavell’s idea of philosophy as translation. As a broader implication of this, I draw out an alternative possibility of becoming cosmopolitan: what happens in the very moment of encountering the untranslatable provides us with an occasion for the transfiguration of our lives. We cannot encounter different cultures as other cultures if we remain fixed within expectations of reciprocal interaction. The teaching of Walden is always indirect, and its purpose is not to moralize about the virtues of acknowledging differences and mutual understanding. This has implications for the education of global citizenship.

Journal of Philosophy of EducationVol. 59(5-6)
Kyoto University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.