Gender stereotypes and goal congruity for adolescents' preferred career and highly gender‐stereotyped occupations

Social role and goal congruity theories propose that occupation gender stereotypes and goal affordances affect career interests. These assumptions were tested by examining adolescents' preferred career interests and their interest in highly gender-stereotyped occupations (HGSOs) in which their gender is also a minority (gender stereotype incongruent). U.S. students aged 12-17 years in 8th and 9th grades (N = 879; 46.5% boys) completed an online survey assessing the gender stereotype and career goals of their preferred future occupation using established rating scales (Barth et al., 2018; Barth & Yang, 2022). Students also reported the gender stereotypes and goal affordances of four HGSOs (Education, Healthcare, Engineering, Construction). Although most adolescents' preferred careers were highly gender stereotyped, their perceptions were more gender neutral. Consistent with goal congruity theory, high-earning or societally beneficial careers were of greatest interest to girls and boys, respectively. But girls rated power/status more importantly than boys. Interest in gender stereotype incongruent occupations was associated with higher ratings on all goals. Gender stereotypes for these occupations were associated with boys' interest in education and girls' interest in engineering. Findings supported and challenged social role and goal congruity theories, suggesting the need to reconsider adolescents' perceptions of gender and stereotypes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Developmental Psychology
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.70030
Primary Topic
Career Development and Diversity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender stereotypes and goal congruity for adolescents' preferred career and highly gender‐stereotyped occupations

Stephanie Masters, Daniel R. Mack, Joan M. Barth
British Journal of Developmental Psychology
Career Development and Diversity
article

Gender stereotypes and goal congruity for adolescents' preferred career and highly gender‐stereotyped occupations

Stephanie Masters, Daniel R. Mack, Joan M. Barth
article en

Abstract

Social role and goal congruity theories propose that occupation gender stereotypes and goal affordances affect career interests. These assumptions were tested by examining adolescents' preferred career interests and their interest in highly gender-stereotyped occupations (HGSOs) in which their gender is also a minority (gender stereotype incongruent). U.S. students aged 12-17 years in 8th and 9th grades (N = 879; 46.5% boys) completed an online survey assessing the gender stereotype and career goals of their preferred future occupation using established rating scales (Barth et al., 2018; Barth & Yang, 2022). Students also reported the gender stereotypes and goal affordances of four HGSOs (Education, Healthcare, Engineering, Construction). Although most adolescents' preferred careers were highly gender stereotyped, their perceptions were more gender neutral. Consistent with goal congruity theory, high-earning or societally beneficial careers were of greatest interest to girls and boys, respectively. But girls rated power/status more importantly than boys. Interest in gender stereotype incongruent occupations was associated with higher ratings on all goals. Gender stereotypes for these occupations were associated with boys' interest in education and girls' interest in engineering. Findings supported and challenged social role and goal congruity theories, suggesting the need to reconsider adolescents' perceptions of gender and stereotypes.

British Journal of Developmental Psychology
University of Alabama (US), Hood College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Career Development and Diversity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.