“You're not necessarily pregnant”: Confusion about emergency contraception

Misconceptions about what emergency contraception does are common and have resulted in policy efforts to restrict access. Understanding the beliefs and reasoning behind people's uncertainty and lack of knowledge about emergency contraception helps shed light on key misconceptions and how advocates, providers, and researchers can improve clarity. We conducted a secondary analysis using previously collected qualitative data from card sort and vignette activities focused on scenarios related to emergency contraception and if participants considered these scenarios abortions (N = 64). We identified three major themes related to participants' classification of emergency contraception: uncertainty and pregnancy liminality; timing and mechanism of action; and the role of intention and overlap with medication abortion. Our study demonstrates that people lack a consistent, coherent understanding of what emergency contraception does, which has implications for contraceptive access and service provision. Furthermore, these misconceptions can become politicized and undergird the rationale for restrictions on sexual and reproductive health care.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
SSM - Qualitative Research in Health
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100678
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Contraception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“You're not necessarily pregnant”: Confusion about emergency contraception

Jennifer Mueller, Laura Lindberg, Alicia VandeVusse
SSM - Qualitative Research in Health
Reproductive Health and Contraception
article

“You're not necessarily pregnant”: Confusion about emergency contraception

Jennifer Mueller, Laura Lindberg, Alicia VandeVusse
article en

Abstract

Misconceptions about what emergency contraception does are common and have resulted in policy efforts to restrict access. Understanding the beliefs and reasoning behind people's uncertainty and lack of knowledge about emergency contraception helps shed light on key misconceptions and how advocates, providers, and researchers can improve clarity. We conducted a secondary analysis using previously collected qualitative data from card sort and vignette activities focused on scenarios related to emergency contraception and if participants considered these scenarios abortions (N = 64). We identified three major themes related to participants' classification of emergency contraception: uncertainty and pregnancy liminality; timing and mechanism of action; and the role of intention and overlap with medication abortion. Our study demonstrates that people lack a consistent, coherent understanding of what emergency contraception does, which has implications for contraceptive access and service provision. Furthermore, these misconceptions can become politicized and undergird the rationale for restrictions on sexual and reproductive health care.

SSM - Qualitative Research in HealthVol. 9
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Reproductive Health and Contraception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“You're not necessarily pregnant”: Confusion about emergency contraception — Jennifer Mueller, Laura Lindberg, et al. · SSM - Qualitative Research in Health (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS