Licensing as governance: the case of the UK private rented sector

Across the UK private rented sector, an increasingly prominent regulatory instrument has emerged: registration and licensing of landlords and property. Expanding from the most risky housing – HMOs – to encompass defined geographical areas or the entire sector, registration and licensing now appear to be key tools for managing the sector. This paper analyses the different licensing regimes operating across the UK’s constituent jurisdictions against the Webbs’ assertion that, “The function of licensing … has always included three distinct forms of control: the power of selection, the power of withdrawal, and the power of imposing conditions”. We add the power of the “platform” as a further form of control through reshaping and integrating regulatory architectures. The scope for (re)configuring these forms of control makes licensing a flexible governance technology, and we explore why governments have adopted such schemes and, in doing so, have varied their design. The paper draws on data from a UK-wide qualitative study conducted in 2018-20.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Housing Studies
Published
2025-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2025.2591792
Primary Topic
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Licensing as governance: the case of the UK private rented sector

David Cowan, Alex Marsh
Housing Studies
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
article

Licensing as governance: the case of the UK private rented sector

David Cowan, Alex Marsh
article en

Abstract

Across the UK private rented sector, an increasingly prominent regulatory instrument has emerged: registration and licensing of landlords and property. Expanding from the most risky housing – HMOs – to encompass defined geographical areas or the entire sector, registration and licensing now appear to be key tools for managing the sector. This paper analyses the different licensing regimes operating across the UK’s constituent jurisdictions against the Webbs’ assertion that, “The function of licensing … has always included three distinct forms of control: the power of selection, the power of withdrawal, and the power of imposing conditions”. We add the power of the “platform” as a further form of control through reshaping and integrating regulatory architectures. The scope for (re)configuring these forms of control makes licensing a flexible governance technology, and we explore why governments have adopted such schemes and, in doing so, have varied their design. The paper draws on data from a UK-wide qualitative study conducted in 2018-20.

Housing Studies
University of Bristol (GB), Cardiff University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.