Oxygen Isotopic Fractionation of O <sub>2</sub> Consumption by Methane and Ammonia Monooxygenases

Understanding stable isotopic fractionation of dissolved O<sub>2</sub> in aquatic environments is crucial to constrain and accurately model the processes responsible for biological O<sub>2</sub> consumption, which are closely linked to the overall health of an ecosystem. This study aimed to investigate whether O<sub>2</sub> consumption by microbial methane and ammonia oxidation may contribute to the observed discrepancy in O<sub>2</sub> isotopic fractionation (<sup>18</sup>ϵ) between heterotrophic O<sub>2</sub> respiration in laboratory incubations (-18 to -24 ‰) and <i>in situ</i> measurements of O<sub>2</sub> consumption in lakes and oceans (-10 to -18 ‰). To estimate the <i>in vivo</i> <sup>18</sup>ϵ values of soluble methane monooxygenase (sMMO), particulate methane monooxygenase (pMMO), and ammonia monooxygenase (AMO), which are the first enzymes required for the oxidation of methane and ammonia, experiments were performed with three methanotrophic bacteria and one comammox (complete-ammonia-oxidizing) bacterium. The resulting <sup>18</sup>ϵ values for pMMO and AMO ranged from -18 ± 12 to -24 ± 5 ‰, not significantly different from <sup>18</sup>ϵ values typical for heterotrophic respiration. The <sup>18</sup>ϵ value determined for sMMO (-22 ± 2 ‰) was in the same range, yet more negative than the previously reported <sup>18</sup>ϵ value for the isolated enzyme. Our results provide insights into the potential reaction mechanisms of pMMO and AMO and indicate that O<sub>2</sub> consumption by sMMO, pMMO, or AMO cannot explain the observed discrepancy between <i>in situ</i> and laboratory <sup>18</sup>ϵ values for "community" O<sub>2</sub> consumption in aquatic environments. Instead, the apparent difference may be attributed to aspects involving substrate diffusion limitation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Environmental Au
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenvironau.5c00180
Primary Topic
Marine and coastal ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Oxygen Isotopic Fractionation of O 2 Consumption by Methane and Ammonia Monooxygenases

Jakob Zopfi, Carolina F. M. de Carvalho, Maartje A. H. J. van Kessel, Sarah G. Pati et al.
ACS Environmental Au
Marine and coastal ecosystems
article

Oxygen Isotopic Fractionation of O 2 Consumption by Methane and Ammonia Monooxygenases

Jakob Zopfi, Carolina F. M. de Carvalho, Maartje A. H. J. van Kessel, Sarah G. Pati, Moritz F. Lehmann, Arjan Pol
article en

Abstract

Understanding stable isotopic fractionation of dissolved O<sub>2</sub> in aquatic environments is crucial to constrain and accurately model the processes responsible for biological O<sub>2</sub> consumption, which are closely linked to the overall health of an ecosystem. This study aimed to investigate whether O<sub>2</sub> consumption by microbial methane and ammonia oxidation may contribute to the observed discrepancy in O<sub>2</sub> isotopic fractionation (<sup>18</sup>ϵ) between heterotrophic O<sub>2</sub> respiration in laboratory incubations (-18 to -24 ‰) and <i>in situ</i> measurements of O<sub>2</sub> consumption in lakes and oceans (-10 to -18 ‰). To estimate the <i>in vivo</i> <sup>18</sup>ϵ values of soluble methane monooxygenase (sMMO), particulate methane monooxygenase (pMMO), and ammonia monooxygenase (AMO), which are the first enzymes required for the oxidation of methane and ammonia, experiments were performed with three methanotrophic bacteria and one comammox (complete-ammonia-oxidizing) bacterium. The resulting <sup>18</sup>ϵ values for pMMO and AMO ranged from -18 ± 12 to -24 ± 5 ‰, not significantly different from <sup>18</sup>ϵ values typical for heterotrophic respiration. The <sup>18</sup>ϵ value determined for sMMO (-22 ± 2 ‰) was in the same range, yet more negative than the previously reported <sup>18</sup>ϵ value for the isolated enzyme. Our results provide insights into the potential reaction mechanisms of pMMO and AMO and indicate that O<sub>2</sub> consumption by sMMO, pMMO, or AMO cannot explain the observed discrepancy between <i>in situ</i> and laboratory <sup>18</sup>ϵ values for "community" O<sub>2</sub> consumption in aquatic environments. Instead, the apparent difference may be attributed to aspects involving substrate diffusion limitation.

ACS Environmental AuVol. 6(1)
University of Vienna (AT), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), University of Basel (CH), Centre de Géosciences (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Marine and coastal ecosystems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.