Multi-model estimate of Antarctic ice-shelf basal mass budget and ocean drivers

Abstract. Societal adaptation to rising sea levels requires robust projections of the Antarctic Ice Sheet's retreat, particularly due to ocean-driven basal melting of its fringing ice shelves. Recent advances in ocean models that simulate ice-shelf melting offer an opportunity to reduce uncertainties in ice–ocean interactions. Here, we compare several community-contributed, circum-Antarctic ocean simulations to highlight inter-model differences, evaluate agreement with satellite-derived melt rates, and examine underlying physical processes. All but one simulation use a melting formulation depending on both thermal driving (T⋆) and friction velocity (u⋆), which together represent the thermal and ocean current forcings at the ice–ocean interface. Simulated melt rates range from 650 to 1277 Gt yr−1 (m=0.45-0.91 m yr−1), driven by variations in model resolution, parameterisations, and sub-ice shelf circulation. Freeze-to-melt ratios span 0.30 % to 30.12 %, indicating large differences in how refreezing is represented. The multi-model mean (MMM), produces an averaged melt rate of 0.64 m yr−1 from a net mass loss of 843 Gt yr−1 (876 Gt yr−1 melting and 33 Gt yr−1 refreezing), yielding a freeze-to-melt ratio of 3.92 %. We define a thermo-kinematic melt sensitivity, ζ=m/(T⋆u⋆)=4.82×10-5 °C−1 for the MMM, with individual models spanning 2.85×10-5 to 19.4×10-5 °C−1. Higher melt rates typically occur near grounding zones where both T⋆ and u⋆ exert roughly equal influence. Because friction velocity is critical for turbulent heat exchange, ice-shelf melting must be characterised by both ocean energetics and thermal forcing. Further work to standardise model setups and evaluation of results against in situ observations and satellite data will be essential for increasing model accuracy, reducing uncertainties, to improve our understanding of ice-shelf–ocean interactions and refine sea-level rise predictions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
˜The œcryosphere
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-6507-2025
Primary Topic
Cryospheric studies and observations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-model estimate of Antarctic ice-shelf basal mass budget and ocean drivers

Ole Richter, David M. Holland, Kazuya Kusahara, Keith W. Nicholls et al.
˜The œcryosphere
Cryospheric studies and observations
article

Multi-model estimate of Antarctic ice-shelf basal mass budget and ocean drivers

Ole Richter, David M. Holland, Kazuya Kusahara, Keith W. Nicholls, Kaitlin A. Naughten, Fabio Boeira Dias, Helene L. Seroussi, Michael S. Dinniman, Madelaine G. Rosevear, Eva A. Cougnon, Wilma G. C. Huneke, Sue Cook, Charles Pelletier, David E. Gwyther, R Porter-Smith, Benjamin K. Galton‐Fenzi, Xylar Asay‐Davis, Ralph Timmermann
article en

Abstract

Abstract. Societal adaptation to rising sea levels requires robust projections of the Antarctic Ice Sheet's retreat, particularly due to ocean-driven basal melting of its fringing ice shelves. Recent advances in ocean models that simulate ice-shelf melting offer an opportunity to reduce uncertainties in ice–ocean interactions. Here, we compare several community-contributed, circum-Antarctic ocean simulations to highlight inter-model differences, evaluate agreement with satellite-derived melt rates, and examine underlying physical processes. All but one simulation use a melting formulation depending on both thermal driving (T⋆) and friction velocity (u⋆), which together represent the thermal and ocean current forcings at the ice–ocean interface. Simulated melt rates range from 650 to 1277 Gt yr−1 (m=0.45-0.91 m yr−1), driven by variations in model resolution, parameterisations, and sub-ice shelf circulation. Freeze-to-melt ratios span 0.30 % to 30.12 %, indicating large differences in how refreezing is represented. The multi-model mean (MMM), produces an averaged melt rate of 0.64 m yr−1 from a net mass loss of 843 Gt yr−1 (876 Gt yr−1 melting and 33 Gt yr−1 refreezing), yielding a freeze-to-melt ratio of 3.92 %. We define a thermo-kinematic melt sensitivity, ζ=m/(T⋆u⋆)=4.82×10-5 °C−1 for the MMM, with individual models spanning 2.85×10-5 to 19.4×10-5 °C−1. Higher melt rates typically occur near grounding zones where both T⋆ and u⋆ exert roughly equal influence. Because friction velocity is critical for turbulent heat exchange, ice-shelf melting must be characterised by both ocean energetics and thermal forcing. Further work to standardise model setups and evaluation of results against in situ observations and satellite data will be essential for increasing model accuracy, reducing uncertainties, to improve our understanding of ice-shelf–ocean interactions and refine sea-level rise predictions.

˜The œcryosphereVol. 19(12)
Dartmouth College (US), Australian National University (AU), Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung (DE), Argonne National Laboratory (US), University of Tasmania (AU), Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JP), British Antarctic Survey (GB), Australian Antarctic Division (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), Integrated Marine Observing System (AU), ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate System Science (AU), University of Rostock (DE), New York University (US), Old Dominion University (US), UCLouvain (BE)
National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, University of Oregon, Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS, Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Nuclear Safety and Security Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Cryospheric studies and observations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.