Comparing ChatGPT Informed Consent Documentations for Energy‐Based Devices
ChatGPT shows promise in generating informed consent documents efficiently, particularly for procedures like radiofrequency microneedling. However, variability in completeness and occasional inaccuracies limit its standalone clinical utility. Dermatologist oversight remains essential. Broader studies are needed to assess the impact of AI-generated forms on patient comprehension and satisfaction in diverse clinical settings.
Authors
- L Kim (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3529-2317)
- Jessica G. Labadie (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4841-6884)
- Jeffrey S. Dover (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3667-0842)
- Susruthi Rajanala (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3819-3007)
Institutions
- Boston University (US)
- Chestnut Hill College (US)
- Brown University (US)
- Yale University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Lasers in Surgery and Medicine
- Published
- 2025-12-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.70080
- Primary Topic
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00