Integrative assessment of the effects of ventilation systems on economic efficiency, milk production, and reproductive performance in dairy cows

Due to global warming, temperate regions are increasingly experiencing heat waves, which negatively impact dairy cow welfare, productivity, and farm profitability. Ventilation systems (VSs) are a common heat mitigation strategy, despite their high initial investment cost. This study investigated the effects of heat stress (HS) and VSs on dairy cows' milk yield and whether VSs guarantee an economic benefit for farmers. The trial involved four dairy farms over 3 years: 2 years before and one after VS installation. We conducted an observational within-farm pre-post study, using two pre-installation years and 0.5-1 post-installation year per farm. The following outcomes were analyzed at the herd level: daily milk yield, biweekly milk quality, and monthly reproductive metrics. The temperature-humidity index (THI) was calculated daily as a measure of HS and categorized as follows: comfort (<72), mild discomfort (72-79), discomfort (80-84), and alert (>84). Economic sustainability was assessed through partial budget analysis, accounting for additional feed, labor, and electricity costs. The presence of VSs was associated with a significant increase in cows' milk yield across all THI conditions (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Fat and protein contents decreased following VS installation, consistent with the observed increase in milk yield. However, their values were significantly lower under the most critical THI classes (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Linear somatic cell count (SCC) scores were higher under the discomfort and alert THI classes in the absence of VSs, whereas they decreased slightly across THI classes when VSs were used (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The duration of lactation, days open, and number of services per pregnancy reached their highest values under THI alert conditions in the absence of VSs and were significantly reduced following the implementation of VS (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Increased milk income with VS use was €12.39/day/cow under mild discomfort, €12.23 under discomfort, and €12.08 under alert conditions. The results showed wide variability in economic outcomes across farms and THI classes. Although differences in VS management prevented a definitive conclusion regarding return on investment (ROI), the findings suggest positive effects on cows' productivity and farm profitability. However, a definitive ROI could not be stated due to heterogeneity in fan size/spacing, cows-per-fan coverage, and farm-specific post-installation durations. Therefore, future cost-benefit analyses should consider additional factors to fully evaluate VS investments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1713828
Primary Topic
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrative assessment of the effects of ventilation systems on economic efficiency, milk production, and reproductive performance in dairy cows

Arzu Peker, Chiara Mondin, Flaviana Gottardo, Severino Segato et al.
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
article

Integrative assessment of the effects of ventilation systems on economic efficiency, milk production, and reproductive performance in dairy cows

Arzu Peker, Chiara Mondin, Flaviana Gottardo, Severino Segato, Luisa Magrin, Samuele Trestini, Nurşen Öztürk, Şükrü Orkan
article en

Abstract

Due to global warming, temperate regions are increasingly experiencing heat waves, which negatively impact dairy cow welfare, productivity, and farm profitability. Ventilation systems (VSs) are a common heat mitigation strategy, despite their high initial investment cost. This study investigated the effects of heat stress (HS) and VSs on dairy cows' milk yield and whether VSs guarantee an economic benefit for farmers. The trial involved four dairy farms over 3 years: 2 years before and one after VS installation. We conducted an observational within-farm pre-post study, using two pre-installation years and 0.5-1 post-installation year per farm. The following outcomes were analyzed at the herd level: daily milk yield, biweekly milk quality, and monthly reproductive metrics. The temperature-humidity index (THI) was calculated daily as a measure of HS and categorized as follows: comfort (<72), mild discomfort (72-79), discomfort (80-84), and alert (>84). Economic sustainability was assessed through partial budget analysis, accounting for additional feed, labor, and electricity costs. The presence of VSs was associated with a significant increase in cows' milk yield across all THI conditions (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Fat and protein contents decreased following VS installation, consistent with the observed increase in milk yield. However, their values were significantly lower under the most critical THI classes (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Linear somatic cell count (SCC) scores were higher under the discomfort and alert THI classes in the absence of VSs, whereas they decreased slightly across THI classes when VSs were used (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The duration of lactation, days open, and number of services per pregnancy reached their highest values under THI alert conditions in the absence of VSs and were significantly reduced following the implementation of VS (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Increased milk income with VS use was €12.39/day/cow under mild discomfort, €12.23 under discomfort, and €12.08 under alert conditions. The results showed wide variability in economic outcomes across farms and THI classes. Although differences in VS management prevented a definitive conclusion regarding return on investment (ROI), the findings suggest positive effects on cows' productivity and farm profitability. However, a definitive ROI could not be stated due to heterogeneity in fan size/spacing, cows-per-fan coverage, and farm-specific post-installation durations. Therefore, future cost-benefit analyses should consider additional factors to fully evaluate VS investments.

Frontiers in Veterinary ScienceVol. 12
University of Padua (IT), Ankara University (TR), Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa (TR), Istanbul University (TR)
Università degli Studi di Padova, Regione del Veneto
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.