Accuracy of deep learning-based AI models for early caries lesion detection: the influence of annotation quality and reference choice

Our findings indicate a strong influence of reference standards on AI model evaluation. While annotation strategies during training did not significantly affect AI accuracy in caries lesion segmentation, evaluation was subject to bias when models were tested against different reference standards. CLINICAL RELEVANCE : AI-based tools for caries detection are becoming common in dentistry. This study shows that how these models are evaluated can significantly impact perceived performance. Clinicians and developers should ensure that evaluation standards are independent and clinically relevant to avoid overestimating AI's diagnostic abilities and to build trust for real-world use and regulatory approval.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Oral Investigations
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-025-06672-z
Primary Topic
Dental Health and Care Utilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accuracy of deep learning-based AI models for early caries lesion detection: the influence of annotation quality and reference choice

Pascal Mettes, Bruno G. Loos, Ricardo Gonzalez-Valenzuela, Henk A. Marquering et al.
Clinical Oral Investigations
Dental Health and Care Utilization
article

Accuracy of deep learning-based AI models for early caries lesion detection: the influence of annotation quality and reference choice

Pascal Mettes, Bruno G. Loos, Ricardo Gonzalez-Valenzuela, Henk A. Marquering, Erwin Berkhout
article en

Abstract

Our findings indicate a strong influence of reference standards on AI model evaluation. While annotation strategies during training did not significantly affect AI accuracy in caries lesion segmentation, evaluation was subject to bias when models were tested against different reference standards. CLINICAL RELEVANCE : AI-based tools for caries detection are becoming common in dentistry. This study shows that how these models are evaluated can significantly impact perceived performance. Clinicians and developers should ensure that evaluation standards are independent and clinically relevant to avoid overestimating AI's diagnostic abilities and to build trust for real-world use and regulatory approval.

Clinical Oral InvestigationsVol. 29(12)
Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Dental Health and Care Utilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Accuracy of deep learning-based AI models for early caries lesion detection: the influence of annotation quality and reference choice — Pascal Mettes, Bruno G. Loos, et al. · Clinical Oral Investigations (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS