Regulating Autonomous Weapon Systems: Searching for African Solutions to Regional and Global Problems

ABSTRACT Lethal autonomous weapon systems (LAWS), while offering strategic advantages in warfare, pose significant ethical, legal, and security risks, especially for countries in the Global South. This article examines how a philosophical perspective, rooted in African ethical and political thought, can enrich regional and global debates on regulating LAWS, which remain dominated by Eurocentric assumptions. The findings of this study, which draw from secondary data, suggest that existing international and regional safeguards are insufficient to address the risks posed by LAWS. It proposes a dual‐theoretical approach informed by technological determinism and grounded in ubuntu . This approach centres on collective human accountability and reinforces the imperative of meaningful human control in the design, deployment, and governance of LAWS to safeguard the security and sovereignty of affected states and communities. This article lays the groundwork for African‐led regulatory mechanisms for emerging military technologies and offers an Afrocentric perspective on rethinking the global governance of LAWS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Regulation & Governance
Published
2025-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.70111
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regulating Autonomous Weapon Systems: Searching for African Solutions to Regional and Global Problems

Christopher Isike, Samuel Oyewole, Ezenwa E. Olumba, Tony Oche
Regulation & Governance
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Regulating Autonomous Weapon Systems: Searching for African Solutions to Regional and Global Problems

Christopher Isike, Samuel Oyewole, Ezenwa E. Olumba, Tony Oche
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Lethal autonomous weapon systems (LAWS), while offering strategic advantages in warfare, pose significant ethical, legal, and security risks, especially for countries in the Global South. This article examines how a philosophical perspective, rooted in African ethical and political thought, can enrich regional and global debates on regulating LAWS, which remain dominated by Eurocentric assumptions. The findings of this study, which draw from secondary data, suggest that existing international and regional safeguards are insufficient to address the risks posed by LAWS. It proposes a dual‐theoretical approach informed by technological determinism and grounded in ubuntu . This approach centres on collective human accountability and reinforces the imperative of meaningful human control in the design, deployment, and governance of LAWS to safeguard the security and sovereignty of affected states and communities. This article lays the groundwork for African‐led regulatory mechanisms for emerging military technologies and offers an Afrocentric perspective on rethinking the global governance of LAWS.

Regulation & Governance
Aston University (GB), African Studies Centre (NL), Federal University Oye Ekiti (NG)
Leverhulme Trust
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.