New Data on the Age and Composition of Volcanogenic–Tuffogenic Rocks of the Upper Pegtymel Depression, Chukotka Terrane

Volcanogenic–tuffogenic rocks of the Upper Pegtymel depression on the southern edge of the Chukotka terrane were studied. Dolerites and acid tuffs yielded a Late Cretaceous age (86–88 Ma). The chemical composition of the studied rocks shows that they accumulated within the active margin in a suprasubduction environment, but they differ in composition from coeval volcanic complexes of the Okhotsk–Chukotka volcanic belt (OChVB) and Upper Jurassic–Early Cretaceous formations. The data obtained allow us to suggest that the mafic volcanics we studied formed from another magmatic source less enriched compared to coeval volcanics of the OChVB and was probably associated with extension in the rear part of the volcanic belt.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Russian Journal of Pacific Geology
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1134/s1819714025700381
Primary Topic
Geological Studies and Exploration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

New Data on the Age and Composition of Volcanogenic–Tuffogenic Rocks of the Upper Pegtymel Depression, Chukotka Terrane

М. V. Luchitskaya, Н. В. Цуканов, K. N. Mazurkevich, Е. В. Ватрушкина
Russian Journal of Pacific Geology
Geological Studies and Exploration
article

New Data on the Age and Composition of Volcanogenic–Tuffogenic Rocks of the Upper Pegtymel Depression, Chukotka Terrane

М. V. Luchitskaya, Н. В. Цуканов, K. N. Mazurkevich, Е. В. Ватрушкина
article en

Abstract

Volcanogenic–tuffogenic rocks of the Upper Pegtymel depression on the southern edge of the Chukotka terrane were studied. Dolerites and acid tuffs yielded a Late Cretaceous age (86–88 Ma). The chemical composition of the studied rocks shows that they accumulated within the active margin in a suprasubduction environment, but they differ in composition from coeval volcanic complexes of the Okhotsk–Chukotka volcanic belt (OChVB) and Upper Jurassic–Early Cretaceous formations. The data obtained allow us to suggest that the mafic volcanics we studied formed from another magmatic source less enriched compared to coeval volcanics of the OChVB and was probably associated with extension in the rear part of the volcanic belt.

Russian Journal of Pacific GeologyVol. 19(6)
Institute of Oceanology. PP Shirshov Russian Academy of Sciences (RU), Geological Institute (RU), A.P. Karpinsky Russian Geological Research Institute (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Geological Studies and Exploration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.