Impact of tannin-based additives on animal performance and enteric methane emissions in dairy and beef cattle: A meta-analysis

This meta-analysis evaluated the effects of tannin-based feed additives on enteric methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions, nutrient digestibility, and animal performance in beef and dairy cattle. A total of 23 peer-reviewed studies comprising 75 treatment means were included in the analysis. Random effects and mixed effects models were used to estimate relative mean differences and identify moderators of response. Robust variance estimation accounted for within-study dependence. Overall, tannin supplementation significantly reduced enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions (-10.2%) and CH<sub>4</sub> yield (-9.3%) across studies in beef and dairy cattle. Although no significant differences were detected between cattle types for CH<sub>4</sub> emissions or yield, the database was unbalanced (14 beef vs. 9 dairy studies), and statistical support for a reduction in lactating dairy cows (7 studies) was weaker when analyzed separately (df = 1.7). These results warrant cautious interpretation for dairy systems. Likewise, no interactions between cattle type and tannin dose were detected for CH<sub>4</sub> emissions or yield. The incomplete factorial representation of tannin types across cattle types further limited the evaluation of potential tannin type × cattle type interactions. No interaction between tannin type and dose was observed for enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions or yield. Methane intensity in dairy (g/kg ECM) and beef cattle (g/kg average daily gain) was not affected by tannin supplementation, mainly due to differences in performance responses across studies. In dairy cattle, tannins had no significant effect on DM intake, milk yield, or milk composition. In beef cattle, tannins significantly decreased fiber digestibility by 9.8%, which was associated with reductions in enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions. Ruminal fermentation parameters and pH were unaffected in both dairy and beef cattle. Meta-regression indicated that CH<sub>4</sub> yield decreased by 1.0% per 1 g/kg DM increase in tannin dose. Effective mitigation generally required inclusion rates above ∼8,000 to 10,000 mg/kg DM, whereas subtherapeutic levels (<1,000 mg/kg DM) were often ineffective or even associated with increased emissions. Overall, standardized condensed tannin additives appear to be a viable mitigation strategy, particularly in beef cattle, where evidence is strongest. In contrast, results for dairy systems remain limited and require confirmation through additional studies. Finally, between-study differences observed for enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions and yield highlight that the magnitude of tannin effects is likely driven more by bioactive properties than tannin type or dose. Future studies should quantify tannin bioactivity and evaluate its interaction with diet and rumen microbiota to enhance mitigation strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Dairy Science
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2025-27254
Primary Topic
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of tannin-based additives on animal performance and enteric methane emissions in dairy and beef cattle: A meta-analysis

E. Kebreab, Nicola Panciroli, V.C. Souza, Kleves V Almeida et al.
Journal of Dairy Science
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
article

Impact of tannin-based additives on animal performance and enteric methane emissions in dairy and beef cattle: A meta-analysis

E. Kebreab, Nicola Panciroli, V.C. Souza, Kleves V Almeida, Olivier Desrues, Peri K Rosenstein
article en

Abstract

This meta-analysis evaluated the effects of tannin-based feed additives on enteric methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions, nutrient digestibility, and animal performance in beef and dairy cattle. A total of 23 peer-reviewed studies comprising 75 treatment means were included in the analysis. Random effects and mixed effects models were used to estimate relative mean differences and identify moderators of response. Robust variance estimation accounted for within-study dependence. Overall, tannin supplementation significantly reduced enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions (-10.2%) and CH<sub>4</sub> yield (-9.3%) across studies in beef and dairy cattle. Although no significant differences were detected between cattle types for CH<sub>4</sub> emissions or yield, the database was unbalanced (14 beef vs. 9 dairy studies), and statistical support for a reduction in lactating dairy cows (7 studies) was weaker when analyzed separately (df = 1.7). These results warrant cautious interpretation for dairy systems. Likewise, no interactions between cattle type and tannin dose were detected for CH<sub>4</sub> emissions or yield. The incomplete factorial representation of tannin types across cattle types further limited the evaluation of potential tannin type × cattle type interactions. No interaction between tannin type and dose was observed for enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions or yield. Methane intensity in dairy (g/kg ECM) and beef cattle (g/kg average daily gain) was not affected by tannin supplementation, mainly due to differences in performance responses across studies. In dairy cattle, tannins had no significant effect on DM intake, milk yield, or milk composition. In beef cattle, tannins significantly decreased fiber digestibility by 9.8%, which was associated with reductions in enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions. Ruminal fermentation parameters and pH were unaffected in both dairy and beef cattle. Meta-regression indicated that CH<sub>4</sub> yield decreased by 1.0% per 1 g/kg DM increase in tannin dose. Effective mitigation generally required inclusion rates above ∼8,000 to 10,000 mg/kg DM, whereas subtherapeutic levels (<1,000 mg/kg DM) were often ineffective or even associated with increased emissions. Overall, standardized condensed tannin additives appear to be a viable mitigation strategy, particularly in beef cattle, where evidence is strongest. In contrast, results for dairy systems remain limited and require confirmation through additional studies. Finally, between-study differences observed for enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions and yield highlight that the magnitude of tannin effects is likely driven more by bioactive properties than tannin type or dose. Future studies should quantify tannin bioactivity and evaluate its interaction with diet and rumen microbiota to enhance mitigation strategies.

Journal of Dairy ScienceVol. 109(3)
Environmental Defense Fund (US), University of New Hampshire (US), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Casa di Cura San Michele (IT), University of California, Davis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.