Time from mechanical ventilation initiation to venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in COVID-19: A prospective, multicentre, observational study

BackgroundThe impact of the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) before venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) on patient outcomes in COVID-19 remains unclear.Methods and settingData from the COVID-19 Critical were used to investigate whether the duration of IMV prior to VV ECMO initiation was associated with ICU mortality between January 1st 2020 and December 31st, 2022. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to evaluate the role of the duration of IMV before ECMO on patient outcomes after adjusting for calendar date and key patient covariates.Results919 adult patients with median age 50 and severe COVID-19 infection requiring IMV and VV ECMO were included in the analysis. The ICU mortality for ECMO performed on the same day as IMV was 43%, compared to 47% when ECMO was initiated between 1 and 7 days and 54% when ECMO was initiated at 8+ days. The 8+ day group of IMV received more prone positioning (71%), neuromuscular blockade (80%), and vasopressor support (74%). The multivariable analysis showed the mortality risk increased when ECMO was initiated within the first 7 days from commencement of IMV (Hazard ratio, HR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.73) or later (HR: 1.51; 1.02 to 2.22), compared with same-day initiation.ConclusionAnalysis indicated a positive association between time on IMV before VV ECMO initiation and ICU mortality, but effects sizes exhibited high uncertainty after adjusting for other patient characteristics. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Perfusion
Published
2025-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02676591251407297
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Time from mechanical ventilation initiation to venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in COVID-19: A prospective, multicentre, observational study

Akram Zaaqoq, Aidan Burrell, Bishoy Zakhary, Chengda Zhang et al.
Perfusion
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

Time from mechanical ventilation initiation to venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in COVID-19: A prospective, multicentre, observational study

Akram Zaaqoq, Aidan Burrell, Bishoy Zakhary, Chengda Zhang, Jacky Yung Suen, Giles J. Peek, Silver Heinsar, Ahmed Labib, Nicole White, Gianluigi Li Bassi, John F. Fraser, Jeffrey P. Jacobs
article en

Abstract

BackgroundThe impact of the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) before venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) on patient outcomes in COVID-19 remains unclear.Methods and settingData from the COVID-19 Critical were used to investigate whether the duration of IMV prior to VV ECMO initiation was associated with ICU mortality between January 1st 2020 and December 31st, 2022. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to evaluate the role of the duration of IMV before ECMO on patient outcomes after adjusting for calendar date and key patient covariates.Results919 adult patients with median age 50 and severe COVID-19 infection requiring IMV and VV ECMO were included in the analysis. The ICU mortality for ECMO performed on the same day as IMV was 43%, compared to 47% when ECMO was initiated between 1 and 7 days and 54% when ECMO was initiated at 8+ days. The 8+ day group of IMV received more prone positioning (71%), neuromuscular blockade (80%), and vasopressor support (74%). The multivariable analysis showed the mortality risk increased when ECMO was initiated within the first 7 days from commencement of IMV (Hazard ratio, HR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.73) or later (HR: 1.51; 1.02 to 2.22), compared with same-day initiation.ConclusionAnalysis indicated a positive association between time on IMV before VV ECMO initiation and ICU mortality, but effects sizes exhibited high uncertainty after adjusting for other patient characteristics. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Perfusion
Griffith University (AU), Queensland University of Technology (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), Oregon Health & Science University (US), Cornell University (US), Wesley Hospital (AU), Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute (AU), The Alfred Hospital (AU), Wesley Medical Center (US), CARE Hospitals (IN), University of Florida (US), North Estonia Medical Centre (EE), Wesley Research Institute (AU), Hamad General Hospital (QA), Prince Charles Hospital (AU), St Andrew’s Hospital (AU), Netcare Unitas Hospital (ZA), Weill Cornell Medical College in Qatar (QA), Prince Charles Hospital (GB), Hamad Medical Corporation (QA), University of Virginia (US), University of Tartu (EE), Monash University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.