P09 Incidence of bacterascites and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) at a tertiary care teaching hospital

Abstract Background Microbiology laboratory receives samples from day-case units for patients undergoing elective drainage of ascites for symptomatic relief only as well as inpatients with suspicion of SBP. The elective samples usually grow organisms of no clinical significance. Background SBP is an infection of ascitic fluid in the absence of any intra-abdominal, surgically treatable source of infection. Also defined by ascitic neutrophil count >250 cells/mm3 or total ascitic white cell count >500 cells/mm3. Bacterascites may represent a transient and spontaneously reversible colonization of ascites but for those who are symptomatic, it may herald SBP. In bacterascites, the ascitic neutrophil count is <250 cells/mm3 but with a positive fluid culture. Objectives To find the incidence of bacterascites and SBP in the ascitic fluid samples sent from the day-case unit, yield from blood culture bottles, pathogens detected and correlation to symptoms. Methods All ascitic fluid samples sent from day unit and inpatients from January 2025 to March 2025 were reviewed using trust’s databases. Results A total of 103 ascitic fluid samples were received. 94 samples were from inpatient and 09 from outpatient/day-case unit. Only 10 samples were culture positive—all from inpatient (9.7%). None of the elective samples from the day case unit had cell count more than 200 and all were culture negative. None of these patients had symptoms of SBP and they underwent drainage for symptomatic relief only. Only 15 samples from inpatient (15.9%) had cell count greater than 250 out of which only 3 were culture positive (Staphylococcus epidermidis, Moraxella osloensis and Bacteroides fragilis). Two of these patients had bowel obstruction and one was done for symptomatic relief. A total of 6 inpatient samples (6.4%) with WCC <250 were culture positive but grew organisms of no clinical significance (mainly ConS and Bacillus subtilis but these patients did not have any symptoms of SBP. Conclusions We may be able to decrease the burden for laboratories by sending a sample for a cell count only from elective asymptomatic patients and performing a culture if the cell count is high.

Publication Details

Journal
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlaf230.016
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P09 Incidence of bacterascites and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) at a tertiary care teaching hospital

JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

P09 Incidence of bacterascites and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) at a tertiary care teaching hospital

article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Microbiology laboratory receives samples from day-case units for patients undergoing elective drainage of ascites for symptomatic relief only as well as inpatients with suspicion of SBP. The elective samples usually grow organisms of no clinical significance. Background SBP is an infection of ascitic fluid in the absence of any intra-abdominal, surgically treatable source of infection. Also defined by ascitic neutrophil count >250 cells/mm3 or total ascitic white cell count >500 cells/mm3. Bacterascites may represent a transient and spontaneously reversible colonization of ascites but for those who are symptomatic, it may herald SBP. In bacterascites, the ascitic neutrophil count is <250 cells/mm3 but with a positive fluid culture. Objectives To find the incidence of bacterascites and SBP in the ascitic fluid samples sent from the day-case unit, yield from blood culture bottles, pathogens detected and correlation to symptoms. Methods All ascitic fluid samples sent from day unit and inpatients from January 2025 to March 2025 were reviewed using trust’s databases. Results A total of 103 ascitic fluid samples were received. 94 samples were from inpatient and 09 from outpatient/day-case unit. Only 10 samples were culture positive—all from inpatient (9.7%). None of the elective samples from the day case unit had cell count more than 200 and all were culture negative. None of these patients had symptoms of SBP and they underwent drainage for symptomatic relief only. Only 15 samples from inpatient (15.9%) had cell count greater than 250 out of which only 3 were culture positive (Staphylococcus epidermidis, Moraxella osloensis and Bacteroides fragilis). Two of these patients had bowel obstruction and one was done for symptomatic relief. A total of 6 inpatient samples (6.4%) with WCC <250 were culture positive but grew organisms of no clinical significance (mainly ConS and Bacillus subtilis but these patients did not have any symptoms of SBP. Conclusions We may be able to decrease the burden for laboratories by sending a sample for a cell count only from elective asymptomatic patients and performing a culture if the cell count is high.

JAC-Antimicrobial ResistanceVol. 7(Supplement_4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.