Benchmarking sessile serrated lesion detection in colonoscopy: individual endoscopist performance has greater impact than specialty training - a retrospective analysis of 12,064 procedures

Individual endoscopist factors have greater impact on SSL detection than specialty training. The dramatic reversal of specialty advantage after excluding just two practitioners demonstrates that apparent specialty-based differences may be driven by a small number of high-performing individuals. Quality improvement initiatives should focus on identifying and disseminating practices of high-performing individuals rather than emphasizing specialty distinctions. We propose benchmarks that align with the 2024 ASGE-ACG guidelines while accounting for Australian detection patterns and provide a quality improvement framework for clinical implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Gastroenterology
Published
2025-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-04523-5
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benchmarking sessile serrated lesion detection in colonoscopy: individual endoscopist performance has greater impact than specialty training - a retrospective analysis of 12,064 procedures

Christina Y. Lee, Stuart Kostalas, Natalie R Dierick
BMC Gastroenterology
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

Benchmarking sessile serrated lesion detection in colonoscopy: individual endoscopist performance has greater impact than specialty training - a retrospective analysis of 12,064 procedures

Christina Y. Lee, Stuart Kostalas, Natalie R Dierick
article en

Abstract

Individual endoscopist factors have greater impact on SSL detection than specialty training. The dramatic reversal of specialty advantage after excluding just two practitioners demonstrates that apparent specialty-based differences may be driven by a small number of high-performing individuals. Quality improvement initiatives should focus on identifying and disseminating practices of high-performing individuals rather than emphasizing specialty distinctions. We propose benchmarks that align with the 2024 ASGE-ACG guidelines while accounting for Australian detection patterns and provide a quality improvement framework for clinical implementation.

BMC GastroenterologyVol. 26(1)
Port Macquarie Base Hospital (AU), Macquarie University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.