Guest Editorial

Different About Social Media Networks?A Framework and Research Agenda" in the MIS Quarterly in 2014, the digital landscape was already undergoing a profound transformation.Social media platforms had rapidly evolved from niche novelties into powerful forces reshaping organizational life and individual interactions.At the time, much scholarship implicitly treated these emerging online networks as mere digital extensions of offline social structures.Our paper challenged this view, arguing that the unique technological affordances of these platforms necessitated a distinct theoretical lens.Our goal was to provide a conceptual toolkit for understanding how technology was fundamentally altering network dynamics and to outline a research agenda that explored these shifts.Receiving the MIS Quarterly Davis-Dickson Impact Award 10 years later presents a welcome opportunity for reflection, prompting us to revisit our 2014 framework, critically assess its enduring relevance, and acknowledge its limitations following a decade of relentless technological and societal change.While the core distinctions highlighted in our original paper remain valuable, developments over the subsequent decade underscore areas where our initial framing requires significant extension.The rise of sophisticated AI-driven content curation and the evolution of the platform economy, synthetic media, and decentralized architectures demand an updated perspective, one that builds upon our original foundation.At the time of our first paper, social media platforms focused more on the social and network aspects of user interactions.They were built around fostering relational states, which are enduring and defined connections, such as friendships or professional contacts (e.g., LinkedIn).Today's platforms have expanded significantly by facilitating relational events.These are discrete, often ephemeral or transactional interactions, such as consuming a piece of content, completing a transaction with a stranger, or viewing an advertisement.This shift has led to a greater emphasis on platforms' media and content sides.For many users, algorithms now largely dictate both "who" and "what" they encounter, making the platform less a "network" of self-chosen ties and more an engine for orchestrating relational events, such as content consumption or fleeting interactions, often with limited or no underlying direct social connection (e.g., TikTok).In essence, today's social media has become the media for many users.1 This Guest Editorial is invited as part of the terms of the 2024 Davis-Dickson MISQ Impact Award.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
MIS Quarterly
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2025/494e2
Primary Topic
Human auditory perception and evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Guest Editorial

Giuseppe Labianca, Stephen P. Borgatti, Maryam Alavi, Gerald C. Kane
MIS Quarterly
Human auditory perception and evaluation
article

Guest Editorial

Giuseppe Labianca, Stephen P. Borgatti, Maryam Alavi, Gerald C. Kane
article en

Abstract

Different About Social Media Networks?A Framework and Research Agenda" in the MIS Quarterly in 2014, the digital landscape was already undergoing a profound transformation.Social media platforms had rapidly evolved from niche novelties into powerful forces reshaping organizational life and individual interactions.At the time, much scholarship implicitly treated these emerging online networks as mere digital extensions of offline social structures.Our paper challenged this view, arguing that the unique technological affordances of these platforms necessitated a distinct theoretical lens.Our goal was to provide a conceptual toolkit for understanding how technology was fundamentally altering network dynamics and to outline a research agenda that explored these shifts.Receiving the MIS Quarterly Davis-Dickson Impact Award 10 years later presents a welcome opportunity for reflection, prompting us to revisit our 2014 framework, critically assess its enduring relevance, and acknowledge its limitations following a decade of relentless technological and societal change.While the core distinctions highlighted in our original paper remain valuable, developments over the subsequent decade underscore areas where our initial framing requires significant extension.The rise of sophisticated AI-driven content curation and the evolution of the platform economy, synthetic media, and decentralized architectures demand an updated perspective, one that builds upon our original foundation.At the time of our first paper, social media platforms focused more on the social and network aspects of user interactions.They were built around fostering relational states, which are enduring and defined connections, such as friendships or professional contacts (e.g., LinkedIn).Today's platforms have expanded significantly by facilitating relational events.These are discrete, often ephemeral or transactional interactions, such as consuming a piece of content, completing a transaction with a stranger, or viewing an advertisement.This shift has led to a greater emphasis on platforms' media and content sides.For many users, algorithms now largely dictate both "who" and "what" they encounter, making the platform less a "network" of self-chosen ties and more an engine for orchestrating relational events, such as content consumption or fleeting interactions, often with limited or no underlying direct social connection (e.g., TikTok).In essence, today's social media has become the media for many users.1 This Guest Editorial is invited as part of the terms of the 2024 Davis-Dickson MISQ Impact Award.

MIS QuarterlyVol. 49(4)
Georgia Institute of Technology (US), University of Kentucky (US), University of Georgia (US), University of Exeter (GB), University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Human auditory perception and evaluation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.