Delivering oral healthcare to asylum seekers and refugees: A mixed-methods service evaluation of charitable mobile dental clinics in England

BackgroundAsylum seekers and refugees (ASR) experience disproportionately poor oral health due to socioeconomic disadvantage and barriers to accessing routine dental care. Although ASR are entitled to free dental treatment through HC2 exemption, practical challenges persist. Charitable organisations such as Dentaid provide mobile community clinics to address this gap.AimThis retrospective mixed-methods service evaluation assessed the accessibility, utilisation, and impact of Dentaid's dental clinics for ASR in England.MethodsQuantitative data from 88 clinics delivered across 11 locations between April 2023 and August 2024 were analysed. Variables included demographics, presenting complaint, treatment provided, and smoking status. A dental-charted subsample of 50 adults was compared with national data. Fisher's Exact Test explored differences between clinic sites. A SWOT-based stakeholder survey was performed and analysed thematically to identify barriers and facilitators in service delivery.ResultsA total of 647 patients received care, with 70% presenting in pain and 42% reporting smoking, almost double the national average. The subsample demonstrated high levels of untreated decay and previous extractions. Common treatments included restorations, extractions, and preventive care. Fisher's Exact Test reported no significant differences between sites. Stakeholders highlighted improved accessibility, cultural sensitivity, and reduced financial barriers, but reported challenges with consistent funding for follow-up clinics and interpreter provision.ConclusionsDentaid's clinics improved access to urgent and preventive care for ASR who struggle to use mainstream dental services. However, reliance on charitable provision reflects structural inequity. Integration with commissioned NHS pathways and sustained Inclusion Health support are required to ensure equitable, long-term access.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Community Dental Health
Published
2025-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0265539x251406742
Primary Topic
Migration, Health and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Delivering oral healthcare to asylum seekers and refugees: A mixed-methods service evaluation of charitable mobile dental clinics in England

Natalie Bradley, Favour Onwudiwe
Community Dental Health
Migration, Health and Trauma
article

Delivering oral healthcare to asylum seekers and refugees: A mixed-methods service evaluation of charitable mobile dental clinics in England

Natalie Bradley, Favour Onwudiwe
article en

Abstract

BackgroundAsylum seekers and refugees (ASR) experience disproportionately poor oral health due to socioeconomic disadvantage and barriers to accessing routine dental care. Although ASR are entitled to free dental treatment through HC2 exemption, practical challenges persist. Charitable organisations such as Dentaid provide mobile community clinics to address this gap.AimThis retrospective mixed-methods service evaluation assessed the accessibility, utilisation, and impact of Dentaid's dental clinics for ASR in England.MethodsQuantitative data from 88 clinics delivered across 11 locations between April 2023 and August 2024 were analysed. Variables included demographics, presenting complaint, treatment provided, and smoking status. A dental-charted subsample of 50 adults was compared with national data. Fisher's Exact Test explored differences between clinic sites. A SWOT-based stakeholder survey was performed and analysed thematically to identify barriers and facilitators in service delivery.ResultsA total of 647 patients received care, with 70% presenting in pain and 42% reporting smoking, almost double the national average. The subsample demonstrated high levels of untreated decay and previous extractions. Common treatments included restorations, extractions, and preventive care. Fisher's Exact Test reported no significant differences between sites. Stakeholders highlighted improved accessibility, cultural sensitivity, and reduced financial barriers, but reported challenges with consistent funding for follow-up clinics and interpreter provision.ConclusionsDentaid's clinics improved access to urgent and preventive care for ASR who struggle to use mainstream dental services. However, reliance on charitable provision reflects structural inequity. Integration with commissioned NHS pathways and sustained Inclusion Health support are required to ensure equitable, long-term access.

Community Dental Health
King's College - North Carolina (US), Health Education England (GB), King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Sisters of Charity Hospital (US), Centerforce (US), Dentsply Sirona (Sweden) (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Migration, Health and Trauma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.