Robotic Rectopexy: A Single-Centre Experience

Background and aims Rectal prolapse and rectocele are socially and psychologically debilitating conditions. While laparoscopic rectopexy has improved outcomes over open surgery, it faces limitations in pelvic access, mesh positioning, and suturing. Robotic-assisted rectopexy may overcome these challenges through enhanced visualisation and manoeuvrability. This study presents a single-centre experience of robotic rectopexy. Methods A retrospective review was conducted at Stepping Hill Hospital, Stockport, UK, from 2019-2024. Data collected included operative time, intra- and postoperative complications, analgesia requirement and length of stay. Results Twenty-one patients underwent robotic rectopexy. The mean operative time was three hours and 18 minutes. No conversions or intraoperative complications were observed. All patients were managed with simple analgesia. Fifteen (71.4%) were discharged on post-operative day (POD) 1, four patients on POD 2 and two patients were discharged later (POD >3). The mean hospital stay was 1.6 days. Two patients had small postoperative collections managed conservatively. One recurrence was observed on follow-up. Conclusions Robotic rectopexy is a safe and effective technique for rectal prolapse, demonstrating minimal complications and short hospital stays. Further research is warranted to assess long-term outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.98398
Primary Topic
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Robotic Rectopexy: A Single-Centre Experience

Sajal Rai, Raheel Anis, Madan Mohan Palliyil, Anil Kumar et al.
Cureus
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
article

Robotic Rectopexy: A Single-Centre Experience

Sajal Rai, Raheel Anis, Madan Mohan Palliyil, Anil Kumar, Mihan Jafari Javid
article en

Abstract

Background and aims Rectal prolapse and rectocele are socially and psychologically debilitating conditions. While laparoscopic rectopexy has improved outcomes over open surgery, it faces limitations in pelvic access, mesh positioning, and suturing. Robotic-assisted rectopexy may overcome these challenges through enhanced visualisation and manoeuvrability. This study presents a single-centre experience of robotic rectopexy. Methods A retrospective review was conducted at Stepping Hill Hospital, Stockport, UK, from 2019-2024. Data collected included operative time, intra- and postoperative complications, analgesia requirement and length of stay. Results Twenty-one patients underwent robotic rectopexy. The mean operative time was three hours and 18 minutes. No conversions or intraoperative complications were observed. All patients were managed with simple analgesia. Fifteen (71.4%) were discharged on post-operative day (POD) 1, four patients on POD 2 and two patients were discharged later (POD >3). The mean hospital stay was 1.6 days. Two patients had small postoperative collections managed conservatively. One recurrence was observed on follow-up. Conclusions Robotic rectopexy is a safe and effective technique for rectal prolapse, demonstrating minimal complications and short hospital stays. Further research is warranted to assess long-term outcomes.

CureusVol. 17(12)
Stepping Hill Hospital (GB), United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Robotic Rectopexy: A Single-Centre Experience — Sajal Rai, Raheel Anis, et al. · Cureus (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS