The Lesbian-Identified Lesbian: Lesbian Feminisms for a Post-Binary Future

Lesbian feminist Monique Wittig’s 1979 provocation that “lesbians are not women” was a prescient forecast for the present era, a time when the designation of woman is increasingly understood as gender essentialist, over-universalizing, and trans-exclusionary by many. Lesbian feminist theory of the 1970s and ’80s is often dismissed as irredeemably white, middle class, and trans exclusionary in its fundamental tenets—a reading that erases the vital contributions of trans, working-class, and women of color lesbian feminists of the era. Moreover, this narrative obscures an abundance of lesbian feminist theory that is, in fact, remarkably compatible with emergent “post-binary” notions of gender and sexuality. In this article, I use the concept of what Jed Samer calls “lesbian potentiality” to reconsider the generative possibilities of these lesbian feminist repertoires of meaning as they pertain to sex, gender, sexuality, and the body. I argue that we stand to benefit from a reconsideration and recontextualization of 1970s and ’80s lesbian feminist texts to make three crucial interventions for the contemporary moment: to resist the claiming of lesbian rights for transphobic ends, to find tools for conceptualizing gendered and sexual power in a post-binary cultural context, and to offer a framework for how to live in an increasingly unlivable world.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Signs
Published
2025-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/737443
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Lesbian-Identified Lesbian: Lesbian Feminisms for a Post-Binary Future

Cati Connell
Signs
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

The Lesbian-Identified Lesbian: Lesbian Feminisms for a Post-Binary Future

Cati Connell
article en

Abstract

Lesbian feminist Monique Wittig’s 1979 provocation that “lesbians are not women” was a prescient forecast for the present era, a time when the designation of woman is increasingly understood as gender essentialist, over-universalizing, and trans-exclusionary by many. Lesbian feminist theory of the 1970s and ’80s is often dismissed as irredeemably white, middle class, and trans exclusionary in its fundamental tenets—a reading that erases the vital contributions of trans, working-class, and women of color lesbian feminists of the era. Moreover, this narrative obscures an abundance of lesbian feminist theory that is, in fact, remarkably compatible with emergent “post-binary” notions of gender and sexuality. In this article, I use the concept of what Jed Samer calls “lesbian potentiality” to reconsider the generative possibilities of these lesbian feminist repertoires of meaning as they pertain to sex, gender, sexuality, and the body. I argue that we stand to benefit from a reconsideration and recontextualization of 1970s and ’80s lesbian feminist texts to make three crucial interventions for the contemporary moment: to resist the claiming of lesbian rights for transphobic ends, to find tools for conceptualizing gendered and sexual power in a post-binary cultural context, and to offer a framework for how to live in an increasingly unlivable world.

SignsVol. 51(2)
Gender Studies (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.