Flip Lists in Elective Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study on Efficiency and Patient Outcomes

Aims This study evaluates the impact of implementing a 'flip list' approach in elective orthopaedic surgery on surgical efficiency, patient satisfaction, and resource utilisation. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted at South West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Epsom General Hospital, London, using prospectively collected data from a high-volume elective orthopaedic centre between August 2019 and April 2024. A total of 373 surgical lists (116 flip, 257 non-flip) involving 1,079 procedures were analysed. A total of 859 arthroplasties were analysed (523 total hip arthroplasty (THA), 326 total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and 10 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) cases). Data included patient demographics, intraoperative variables, and post-operative outcomes. Key outcomes included theatre efficiency (procedure count, duration, touch time), postoperative outcomes (length of stay, complication/readmission rates), patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)/patient-reported experience measures (PREMs), and income generated. Statistical analysis was performed using t-tests, Chi-square, and Fisher's exact tests (p < 0.05 considered significant). Results Flip lists facilitated significantly more procedures per list (3.17 vs. 2.77; <i>p</i> < 0.001) with reduced operative duration (68 vs. 91 minutes) and shorter hospital stays (1.83 vs. 2.24 days; <i>p </i>< 0.001). No significant differences were observed in complication rates, readmissions, mortality, or patient-reported outcomes over a two-year follow-up. Economic analysis showed comparable income per case, but greater total revenue per list due to increased volume. Conclusion Flip lists enhance theatre efficiency and throughput in elective arthroplasty without compromising safety or patient satisfaction. The model aligns with Getting It Right First Time (GIRFT) principles and offers a scalable, high-impact solution for emerging high-volume elective orthopaedic centres aiming to meet rising demands whilst maintaining quality of care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.98397
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Flip Lists in Elective Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study on Efficiency and Patient Outcomes

Arif Ali Baig Moghal, Sharo Naqar, Ayman Ahmed, Sarkhell Radha et al.
1 citations
Cureus
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
2.01
article

Flip Lists in Elective Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study on Efficiency and Patient Outcomes

Arif Ali Baig Moghal, Sharo Naqar, Ayman Ahmed, Sarkhell Radha, Irrum Afzal, Nimra Akram
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Aims This study evaluates the impact of implementing a 'flip list' approach in elective orthopaedic surgery on surgical efficiency, patient satisfaction, and resource utilisation. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted at South West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Epsom General Hospital, London, using prospectively collected data from a high-volume elective orthopaedic centre between August 2019 and April 2024. A total of 373 surgical lists (116 flip, 257 non-flip) involving 1,079 procedures were analysed. A total of 859 arthroplasties were analysed (523 total hip arthroplasty (THA), 326 total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and 10 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) cases). Data included patient demographics, intraoperative variables, and post-operative outcomes. Key outcomes included theatre efficiency (procedure count, duration, touch time), postoperative outcomes (length of stay, complication/readmission rates), patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)/patient-reported experience measures (PREMs), and income generated. Statistical analysis was performed using t-tests, Chi-square, and Fisher's exact tests (p < 0.05 considered significant). Results Flip lists facilitated significantly more procedures per list (3.17 vs. 2.77; <i>p</i> < 0.001) with reduced operative duration (68 vs. 91 minutes) and shorter hospital stays (1.83 vs. 2.24 days; <i>p </i>< 0.001). No significant differences were observed in complication rates, readmissions, mortality, or patient-reported outcomes over a two-year follow-up. Economic analysis showed comparable income per case, but greater total revenue per list due to increased volume. Conclusion Flip lists enhance theatre efficiency and throughput in elective arthroplasty without compromising safety or patient satisfaction. The model aligns with Getting It Right First Time (GIRFT) principles and offers a scalable, high-impact solution for emerging high-volume elective orthopaedic centres aiming to meet rising demands whilst maintaining quality of care.

CureusVol. 17(12)
Croydon University Hospital (GB), Epsom Hospital (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.