Unsupervised Clustering of 3D Hand Scans Using K-Means and Gaussian Mixture Models (GMM)

The precise segmentation and classification of anatomical structures from three-dimensional (3D) scan data are critical for advancing personalized rehabilitation protocols, custom prosthetic fabrication, and the development of ergonomically optimized assistive technologies. Accurate identification of anatomical subregions facilitates improved device fit, enhances biomechanical performance, and supports patient-specific interventions. This study investigates the applicability and comparative performance of two unsupervised clustering algorithms, K-Means and Gaussian Mixture Models (GMM), for the segmentation of high-resolution 3D hand scan datasets. The hand models were acquired using a structured light scanning system, enabling the capture of complex surface geometries with sub-millimeter accuracy. Geometric descriptors were extracted from the reconstructed models and served as the input feature space for clustering, eliminating the need for pre-labeled training data. The performance of K-Means and GMM was evaluated based on segmentation accuracy, adaptability to morphological variations, and computational efficiency. Results analysis demonstrate that while K-Means offers reduced computational complexity and suitability for real-time processing, GMM provides superior adaptability and segmentation fidelity, attributed to its probabilistic representation of data distributions. These findings suggest that GMM is a more robust approach for capturing the inherent variability of anatomical structures, thereby holding greater potential for applications requiring high precision in patient-specific modeling and biomechanical analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ist66504.2025.11268390
Primary Topic
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unsupervised Clustering of 3D Hand Scans Using K-Means and Gaussian Mixture Models (GMM)

Yaser Sabzehmeidani, Andrei-Alexandru Popa
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
article

Unsupervised Clustering of 3D Hand Scans Using K-Means and Gaussian Mixture Models (GMM)

Yaser Sabzehmeidani, Andrei-Alexandru Popa
article en

Abstract

The precise segmentation and classification of anatomical structures from three-dimensional (3D) scan data are critical for advancing personalized rehabilitation protocols, custom prosthetic fabrication, and the development of ergonomically optimized assistive technologies. Accurate identification of anatomical subregions facilitates improved device fit, enhances biomechanical performance, and supports patient-specific interventions. This study investigates the applicability and comparative performance of two unsupervised clustering algorithms, K-Means and Gaussian Mixture Models (GMM), for the segmentation of high-resolution 3D hand scan datasets. The hand models were acquired using a structured light scanning system, enabling the capture of complex surface geometries with sub-millimeter accuracy. Geometric descriptors were extracted from the reconstructed models and served as the input feature space for clustering, eliminating the need for pre-labeled training data. The performance of K-Means and GMM was evaluated based on segmentation accuracy, adaptability to morphological variations, and computational efficiency. Results analysis demonstrate that while K-Means offers reduced computational complexity and suitability for real-time processing, GMM provides superior adaptability and segmentation fidelity, attributed to its probabilistic representation of data distributions. These findings suggest that GMM is a more robust approach for capturing the inherent variability of anatomical structures, thereby holding greater potential for applications requiring high precision in patient-specific modeling and biomechanical analysis.

University of Southern Denmark (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.